Re: Regarding those Prop. 65 notices


> Let me know. If it's much later, or on a different thread, I may miss
> it entirely, so let me know.
>
> - dentaldoc


I found one of the references and posted it in another thread
under a new subject.
According to this source :

1) The dental board did fire Chet Y from his duty to compile
a fact ***

2) Dr. Terlit is pro-amalgam

3) The dental board consisted of many re-apponites from
the previous dental board which refused to publish
a fact *** for many years.

4) The CDA did have substantial involvemnet with the dental
even brining in an expert witness to provide pro-amalgam
testimony against prop 65. Arline Terlit also suddenly and
mysteriously produced a new fact *** similar to the CDA's
position.

5) None of the supposedly "amalgam neutral" dental board members
where able to find time to testify in hearings held
by congressman Burton and Watson, the exception being
Dr. Chet Yokoyama.

6) Finally another link on TT.net states that Terlit also
took steps to thwart the distribution of the new fact
*** and judging from her actions is very much under the
influence of the CDA association.

.

Loading