Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board


"Steven Fawks" <tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2Mqke.1790$oT1.1157@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> Coming from toxicteeth, what would you expect them to say
> considering they did not ban amalgam outright?
>
> Fawks
>
What I don't get about organizations like this is that those who post links
to them and/or similar sites are willing to ignore the incestuous
relationships associated with these sites. We are bombarded with warnings
about the conspiracy of organized medicine and dentistry, yet the owners of
the toxicteeth web site run a company that serves to profit handily from
people buying into what they say on that web site.

I am not saying this instantly makes the information wrong, but it is a bit
disingenuous to only fault those you disagree with for being part of a
conspiracy, when arguments that support "your" side are often put forth by
people with equally suspect motivation.

T


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
    ... > the toxicteeth web site run a company that serves to profit handily from ... > people buying into what they say on that web site. ... Tony, Tony, Tony, they are NOT doing it for any monetary gain!!!!! ... > people with equally suspect motivation. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Aliens and cognitive dissonance
    ... Gene Ward Smith wrote in ... Conspiracy shut it down. ... Uh, yeah. ... They still have a web site, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)