Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board


Tony Bad wrote:
> <clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1116898181.888577.209420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Jeff Clark is a self-described Am poisoning victim. After
> > he discovered this if I recall correctly he did, as his own
business
> > venture go to work for CFS Nutrtion part time while working (I
believe
> > full time as an engineer) because some of their products like NAC
can
> > be helpful in Hg detoxification. You can read about his history and
CFS
> > on his website.
> >
> > I have no idea how much a domain name costs, but the info
> > is being put up by amalgam victims not company reps. .
> > Why should people volunteering their time such as Jeff Clark
> > have to shoulder all the costs and their time while still
recovering
> > from AM poisoning.
> >
> > So far I have no indication that the posted information is
> > incorrect and CFS nutrition would only benifit if they thought
> > that amalgam toxicity would official be recognized as a national
> > phenommena. Whatever their degree of involvement I think it
> > is more out of confidence in the serious of the issue and some
> > creative armtwisting from Jeffclark. This is just my guess.
> >
> >
> I agree with what you say, and as I said, the connection shouldn't
make the
> info automatically suspect....but the point I was trying to make was
that a
> similar connection on the other side of the argument would be taken
by some
> as evidence of conspiracy. This free pass being exclusively afforded
to
> those one agrees with seems unreasonable and disingenuous.
>
> T

Let's see who is being disingenuous. You want to bet $1000 that the
information posted is accurate? But you sit there calling me
disingenuous. Let's see you practice the honesty you preach.

.