Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board


Tony Bad wrote:
> <clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message

>
> Your reading skills need polishing. I wasn't calling YOU > anything,
nor did I
> state the information wasn't accurate. YOU entered this discussion on
your
> own and now assumed the position of victim. If you feel the
disingenuous
> label applies to you, that is your choice.
>
> As for giving those you agree with a free pass, thanks for proving my
point.

I thought you just said that your comments didn't apply to me.

>
> Do you really want to assume the burden of proving that web site is
100%
> accurate?

Lets take a few key points, such as:

Was Chet Y fired from his post?

Was the dental board subsequently sued for illegally
taking over the fact *** committe?

Did the CDA bring in an "expert" to testify for amalgam?

Did this or previous dental boards take any illegal action to stop
distribution of a fact *** and are many of the appointees holdovers
from the previous pro-amalgam law defying dental board.

Or is your $1000 bet going to be you weaseling out by making me do
> the work? Since you opened your mouth, I'll take your bet, now prove
your
> position.

It must be obvious to you that on key points you will lose the
bet. Notice how Dr. Bill Combs is suddenly silent.
If you want me to take your money I will.
3 key points, make it $2000. If you lose you have to
donate the money to TT.net and as in survivor you will
be forever banished from sci.med.

Id also like to start a bet with Steve F that no amalgam
ever loses more than 5% of its Hg nor can significant amounts
be methylized. EASY money. Why didn't I think of this before?

.