Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board


<clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1116947436.439632.48940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Tony Bad wrote:
>> <clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
>>
>> Your reading skills need polishing. I wasn't calling YOU > anything,
> nor did I
>> state the information wasn't accurate. YOU entered this discussion on
> your
>> own and now assumed the position of victim. If you feel the
> disingenuous
>> label applies to you, that is your choice.
>>
>> As for giving those you agree with a free pass, thanks for proving my
> point.
>
> I thought you just said that your comments didn't apply to me.
>
>>
>> Do you really want to assume the burden of proving that web site is
> 100%
>> accurate?
>
> Lets take a few key points, such as:
>
> Was Chet Y fired from his post?
>
> Was the dental board subsequently sued for illegally
> taking over the fact *** committe?
>
> Did the CDA bring in an "expert" to testify for amalgam?
>
> Did this or previous dental boards take any illegal action to stop
> distribution of a fact *** and are many of the appointees holdovers
> from the previous pro-amalgam law defying dental board.
>
> Or is your $1000 bet going to be you weaseling out by making me do
>> the work? Since you opened your mouth, I'll take your bet, now prove
> your
>> position.
>
> It must be obvious to you that on key points you will lose the
> bet. Notice how Dr. Bill Combs is suddenly silent.
> If you want me to take your money I will.
> 3 key points, make it $2000. If you lose you have to
> donate the money to TT.net and as in survivor you will
> be forever banished from sci.med.
>
> Id also like to start a bet with Steve F that no amalgam
> ever loses more than 5% of its Hg nor can significant amounts
> be methylized. EASY money. Why didn't I think of this before?
>
RIGHT ON Clinton.

These dentists have lied for so long, they are pathetic. Bill Combs is noted
for becoming silent when he can't answer questions.

LL/Jan


.

Quantcast