Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: "Lady Lollipot" <LadyLollipot@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 May 2005 18:39:41 -0700
LadyLollipop wrote:
> "Steven Fawks" <tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:nuFke.2183$oT1.308@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > That's why I remind readers that I haven't placed an amalgam for over 20
> > years, but I still don't fall for all the toxic teeth crap.
>
> It is NOT crap. It is PROVEN that amalgams left off vapors and the harm
> done!
What has not been PROVEN is whether some day I will be able to write a
complete sentence that makes sense!
>
>
> > I'm about as unbiased as you could find. I have no financial interest
> > in supporting amalgam use. I have a very limited financial interest in
> > being anti-amalgam in that I could make more money by hinting at amalgam
> > toxicity, but I don't sell snake oil.
> >
> > Anyone that puts extreme effort into being anti-amalgam is either a little
> > spacey or selling something (or both).
> >
> > Fawks
>
> The EPA is spacey and selling something. Fawks is well into denial, cares
> NOT about the harm to people nor the environment.
Did I say the EPA is spacey? I meant NASA. NASA is spacey. The EPA must
be selling something! They must have a website where they sell
pro-amalgam coffee cups or something. so there.
LL
>
> http://www.mercurypolicy.org/
>
> Read the entire page Fawks, learn something.
>
> Read this:
>
> http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/members/2005/7743/7743.pdf
>
> http://www.mercurypolicy.org/exposure/documents/model_state_leg.pdf
>
> And then,,,,,,,,,,,,,STOP L Y I N G!!!!!!
>
> LL/Jan
>
>
> >> What I don't get about organizations like this is that those who post
> >> links
> >> to them and/or similar sites are willing to ignore the incestuous
> >> relationships associated with these sites. We are bombarded with warnings
> >> about the conspiracy of organized medicine and dentistry, yet the owners
> >> of
> >> the toxicteeth web site run a company that serves to profit handily from
> >> people buying into what they say on that web site.
> >>
> >> I am not saying this instantly makes the information wrong, but it is a
> >> bit
> >> disingenuous to only fault those you disagree with for being part of a
> >> conspiracy, when arguments that support "your" side are often put forth
> >> by
> >> people with equally suspect motivation.
> >>
> >> T
> >>
> >>
> >
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: Steven Fawks
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: carabelli
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- References:
- link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: clintonz
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: clintonz
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: Steven Fawks
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: Tony Bad
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: Steven Fawks
- Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- From: LadyLollipop
- link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- Prev by Date: Re: 10,000 People Poisoned By Amalgam
- Next by Date: Re: From Joel Eichen
- Previous by thread: Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- Next by thread: Re: link about Chet and the CA Dental Board
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|