Re: caries question
- From: Steven Fawks <tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:52:36 GMT
The most important thing to keep in mind is when to place [or I should say "if to place"] the first filling. We don't have any filling material that duplicates natural tooth structure, and once the initial filling is placed, the usual scenario is that the filling breaks down and needs to be replaced in 5 or 10 years. Each time the filling is replaced, the "hole" gets a bit larger, and the tooth gets more irritated by the drilling/filling. Eventually, a crown is needed, and sometimes root canal treatment as well.
I have been using sealants and PRR's to some degree for many years. I
don't have 20 year studies, but I do have 26 years of anecdotal observation. I think the early intervention with very small restorations to eradicate the caries will save a lot of tooth structure
over time.
I believe this idea was more true of the days with GV Black preps and
amalgam use than with todays techniques. Even with the medium sized
Class I amalgams, the 5 year replacement theory does not often turn into
reality. I do see a lot of 40-60 yr.-olds who need a few crowns. Most of these were not due to an intitial occlusal amalgam. They may have
had occlusal decay treated with an amalgam in 1964, but new areas of decay led to an MO, then an MOD, and then cusps began to fracture. It is rarely continued replacement of one filling that leads to a crown.
Fawks
.
- References:
- caries question
- From: viktor011
- Re: caries question
- From: Jacob
- caries question
- Prev by Date: Re: DENTAL PLAN !!! BROKERS AND MEMBERS WANTED!!!
- Next by Date: Re: Pre-Dental or Bachelor of Science?
- Previous by thread: Re: caries question
- Next by thread: Glidewell any good?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|