Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Dr. Steve <Drsteve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:51:35 GMT
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:44:16 GMT, Rob <riaboni@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I have to replace an amalgam filling in my upper molar that is large.
> From what I understand, one option is to have the tooth reconstructed
>with a porcelain or gold onlay, rather than a composite "white" filling
>for durability.
>My question is, would a gold inlay filling be an option, rather than the
>onlay? Isn't gold as strong as the amalgam?
>
>If I have the reconstruction, should I choose gold over the porcelain?
>I would like to keep as much of the tooth as possible and to use the
>more friendlier material for tooth enamel.
>
>
>Thanks
>rtwin
Gold compared to laboratory fired porcelain onlay, the gold is better.
Gold compared to machine milled ceramic, the porcelain is better. I
would not recommmend doing a large filling in composite or amalgam.
If you like jewlery in your mouth, opt for gold. If you like teeth
which look and feel natural, choose *machine-milled* ceramic.
This is my opinion based on my personal experience, the experience of
the other dentsits I have spoken with, and the research articles that
Ihave read in the past 6 years.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Rob
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- References:
- Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Rob
- Gold or porcelain onlays
- Prev by Date: Re: Recommended radiograph processor for purchase
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for people with bad teeth for UK TV health programme
- Previous by thread: Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- Next by thread: Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading