Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Dr. Steve <Drsteve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:57:12 GMT
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 20:42:12 GMT, Mark & Steven Bornfeld
<bornfeldmung@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Dr. Steve wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 19:20:13 GMT, W_B <no_one@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On 25 Aug 2005 12:14:10 -0700, "Flap" <fullosseousflap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Dr. Steve,
>>>>
>>>>How is a CEREC or a Cad-Cam milled all ceramic restoration kinder to
>>>>the tooth than gold?
>>>>
>>>>Flap
>>>>
>>>>http://flapsblog.com
>>>
>>>Non-glazed (but polished) porcelain is almost equal in wear characteristics to enamel.
>>
>>
>> Closer to enamel in wear characteristics and in thermal
>> expansion-contraction than gold.
>
>
> Really? I'm not doubting you, just that I'd always understood that no
>dental material was closer to tooth structure in wear and cfe than gold.
>
>Steve
That was true in the 1980's. It is no longer the case. If you glaze
the machine milled ceramic, then it gets almost as hard as laboratory
fired porcelain. But,,,,,,,,,,, polished, the ceramic has a surface
hardness between gold and tooth (closer to tooth than gold).
```````````````````````
Stephen (What's a temporary?)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Flap
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- References:
- Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Rob
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Dr . Steve
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Rob
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Dr . Steve
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Flap
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Dr . Steve
- Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- From: Mark & Steven Bornfeld
- Gold or porcelain onlays
- Prev by Date: Re: Hilary Duff's New Teeth
- Next by Date: Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- Previous by thread: Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- Next by thread: Re: Gold or porcelain onlays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|