Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:56:18 GMT
"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-8E8601.23154626082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <p4QPe.69386$084.30730@attbi_s22>,
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:PhD_failure-B86580.19090726082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > In article <1125098273.139236.181810@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> > clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> >
>> >> billkatz wrote:
>> >> > Huh?
>> >> >
>> >> > October issue of the NEJM [NEJM, 349(19):1731-1737, Oct 2003]. The
>> >> > article is entitled "The Toxicology of Mercury - Current Exposures
>> >> > and Clinical Manifestations."
>> >> >
>> >> > (Pages 1732-1733), "Patients who have questions about the potential
>> >> > relation between mercury and degenerative diseases can be assured
>> >> > that
>> >> > the available evidence shows no connection."
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I said that the NEJM had reported "finally" that amalgam was the
>> >> largest exposure of elemental Hg in the population, probably in that
>> >> article, though it could be a different recent one.
>> >>
>> >> Yes that (probably)same article was pretty brutally criticized for
>> >> then
>> >> concluding that exposure to Hg was really no big deal afterall.
>> >> did you read the entire article to see if what i said was true or
>> >> just take irrelevent snippet to deflect my main point?
>> >>
>> >> It was basically a defensive, biased "summary of the literature", not
>> >> a research piece, by pro-Hg (and nearly senile) 60's throwback
>> >> toxicologist and dental industry gun Clarkson IIRC.
>> >>
>> >> You might think it illogical that Clarkson or the NEJM could admit
>> >> that amalgam was the largest source of elemental Hg (do they have any
>> >> choice?) then turn around and say but look "no problem". A lot of
>> >> other
>> >> people felt that way too! On the other hand what are the dentists and
>> >> doctors supposed to do, publish an article which says, look we've
>> >> been
>> >> exposing people to high levels of Hg and endangering their health all
>> >> these years?
>> >
>> > So are you Pro NEJM?
>>
>> Are you, Robert?
>>
>> Just what is your interest here?
>
> To bash spammers and correct mistakes.
I suggest you get lost.
To error is human.
Perhaps this will direct you as to where you will should go:
Web Results 1 - 10 of about 190,000 for bash newsgroups. (0.24
seconds)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: Peter Bowditch
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: Robert Morien
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- References:
- Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: Keith P Walsh
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: clintonz
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: billkatz
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: clintonz
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: Robert Morien
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- From: Robert Morien
- Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- Prev by Date: Re: X-Ray without a vest?
- Next by Date: Off Topic: Swan Fountain
- Previous by thread: Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- Next by thread: Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace
- Index(es):