Re: Mercury-Free Bandwagon Gathers Pace

In article <tqdQe.313053$xm3.77360@attbi_s21>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:PhD_failure-FBA5D7.23401727082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <mqcQe.312951$xm3.289380@attbi_s21>,
> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> "Peter Bowditch" <myfirstname@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >
> >> > <snip>
> >> >
> >> >>>> Just what is your interest here?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> To bash spammers and correct mistakes.
> >> >>
> >> >>I suggest you get lost.
> >> >>
> >> >>To error is human.
> >> >>
> >> >>Perhaps this will direct you as to where you will should go:
> >> >>
> >> >> Web Results 1 - 10 of about 190,000 for bash newsgroups. (0.24
> >> >>seconds)
> >> >
> >> > Learn to use Google, Jan.
> >>
> >> This thread in not about Jan.
> >>
> >> It is sad there are such despicable stalkers.
> >>
> > The thread has been hijacked
>
> YES, sadly a stalker hijacked it second, after YOU deverted with your usual.

You have a stalker? You should report her to the police immediately. Me,
I'm just a spammer abuser...are you feeling abused?


>
> <snip>
>
> The thread WAS actually about:
>

<spam snipped>


spamming again I see. It shall be reported.

>
> and it is about spammers
>
> NO, it was NEVER about spammers.

in the sense that you use plural you are correct. but you are a spammer
and it was about you.

>
> ...so it is about
> you.
>
> And so YOU are LYING again.

lolly never bashes

>
> > But remember, you never bash
>
> Remember That is YOU.

you mean that was me suggesting a web search for bash newsgroups?

>
> What's more you are nothing but a trouble maker and L I A R here.

Post one single lie that I've posted here. Can't do it.

>
> *In the states we'd call that boutique dentistry and the dentists doing
> nothing except finding another creative way to get money from patients.
>
> IE, doing it for the money not the "science"
>
>
> The We'd must be you and a talking mouse in your pocket.

Cute, no cigar, but cute none-the-less. I imagine that since there are
so many web results for "jan drew loves to ***"
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=jan+drew+loves+to+***&btnG=Google+S
earch that it is you that carries mice in your "pocket"

>
> Basher, liar.

Is the spammer feeling abused again?



































just admit you spammed and apologise and you'll be left alone until the
next time you spam.


































and I'm still waiting for the prove of that unsubstantiated survey/poll
that you tried to use to further your agenda. Can't do it can you?
.

Loading