Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Peter Meiers <Tren_Dean@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2005 21:24:55 +0200
Hi Stovepipe,
> JME is right, if perhaps loose with his terminology. Since the use of
> fuoride to combat carious attack, the bacteria have taken to attacking
> deep inside the fissures and grooves that naturally criscross the
> occlusal surface of teeth. This causes deep and latreally spreading
> caries that are not necessarily visible on the surface of the tooth. The
> DiagnoDent was developed chiefly to sniff out this type of caries, I
> think.
I still doubt that fluoride has much to do with that. Couldn´t it be
that a cavity starts in (and spreads into the tooth from) a small area
at a distal or mesial surface where it can´t be seen easily because
maybe two molars are too close to another and hide the initial lesion?
No matter what the fluoride status of such a tooth is.
What facts would favor a fluoride involvement?
Cheers,
Peter
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Joel M . Eichen
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Stovepipe
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- References:
- another is it a cavity post...
- From: XYZ
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Joel344
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Peter Meiers
- Re: another is it a cavity post...
- From: Stovepipe
- another is it a cavity post...
- Prev by Date: Re: another is it a cavity post...
- Next by Date: Re: dental costs in the netherlands compared to the us
- Previous by thread: Re: another is it a cavity post...
- Next by thread: Re: another is it a cavity post...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|