Re: Note to Robert Morien

In article <jSJVe.106784$084.69052@attbi_s22>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
> three.
>
> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
> id <20050913053025q9200k7407e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:30:25 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:09:05 -0000
> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> (208.25.62.167)
> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> 23:09:05 -0700
> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> Newsgroups:
> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:21 -0700
> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
> > >
> > >>
> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> > >> anything.
> > >
> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are
> > > a
> > > few that deserve being ignored.
> > >
> > > carabelli
> >
> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> > Dan
> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
> > the
> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
> >
> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
>
> I only harass spammers.
>
> Do you feel harassed?
>
> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
> id <20050913052949q9200k4hile>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:29:49 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:08:29 -0000
> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> (208.25.62.167)
> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> 23:08:29 -0700
> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> Newsgroups:
> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:29:46 -0700
> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-3E5E9C.22294612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
> > >
> > >>
> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> > >> anything.
> > >
> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there are
> > > a
> > > few that deserve being ignored.
> > >
> > > carabelli
> >
> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> > Dan
> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to ignore
> > the
> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
> >
> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
>
> And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so we
> can all understand.
>
> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> by sccqmxc93.asp.att.net (sccqmxc93) with SMTP
> id <20050913052644q930039800e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:26:44 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> Received: (qmail 5068 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:05:24 -0000
> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> (208.25.62.167)
> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> 23:05:24 -0700
> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> Newsgroups:
> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> References: <1h2dzeo.e8vq1f1ba96mjN%stove99pipe@xxxxxxxx>
> <Sue.1ux0oo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <1125992435.465797.94100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> <PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>
> <PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>
> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:26:37 -0700
> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-003C20.22263712092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
> > > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > >> news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >> > In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
> > >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the physics
> > >> >> > department of your local college/university and asking them this?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety
> > >> >> of
> > >> >> amalgams?
> > >> >>
> > >> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
> > >> >> typical
> > >> >> dental
> > >> >> amalgams?
> > >> >
> > >> > I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
> > >>
> > >> OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
> > >>
> > >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety of
> > >> amalgams?
> > >>
> > >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of typical
> > >> dental
> > >> amalgams?
> > >>
> > >> <snip>
> > >
> > > Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
> >
> > Afraid not.
> >
> > The fact is:
> >
> > You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
> > refuse to answer them.
>
> Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
> clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him about.
>
> I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could easily
> answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could easily
> answer. That makes you a terrorist.
>
> >
> > This is a dental newsgroup.
>
> are you a dentist?
>
> >
> > You have run out of excuses for not answering.
>
> I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
> irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.
>
> >
> > You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
>
> You are here to harass, admit it.
>
> >
> > <snip>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Just what is your position on tampons





I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
might have gone to you that way.
.