Re: It's Time For A WAKE UP CALL!


"george1234" <george1234pds@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k9lgi15dibmvhjh05avatnund4udfodu2l@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:08:21 GMT, "LadyLollipop"
> <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you believe name calling over such a trivial choisce of usenet
>>> options supports your position?
>
>>I believe in calling a spade a spade.
>>#4. Your post was RUDE, uncalled for, and disrespectful

#1 It is most impolite to snip in the middle of a post.
>
> Reflect on the juxtoposition of these two statements, Ace;)

What is a juxtopostion?
>
> Back on topic, you have not adressed the problem of contradictiory
> evidence.

Wrong. I did address it, you very impolitely, snipped it.

Here it is again:
*The difference for the direct counter was


the sake of an *argument*

==
I am not interested in any *argument*

Do you believe as Clinton does that amalgam is not the
> source of the problem, and that there are other elements to the cited
> case?

I agree with Clinton.

However what you twisted above is NOT what Clinton said.

You are a VERY DISHONEST PERSON!!!

Here is what Clinton said:

You moron. Every configuration of amalgam placement is different.
the chemical concentration/condensation of the amalgam and or crown
could be different. The placement, paths of saliva conduction, saliva
ph, and acidic breakown from bacteria as well as mineral/acid
interactions from local tooth loss, or even immune system interaction
and or crevice corrosion (which is real and can create strong acids
simple from scavanging mechanisms in sealed or statica areas near the
amalgam) couild all create various different states of chemical
breakdown and galvanic interaction. gold will even interact with
amalgam if they are separated by cement. Once corrision sets in high
copper amalgams it is also exponential with depth and certainly would
result in a wide variety of states of galvanic interaction. Only in
your dipsidoddle dumbass world does you "counter example prove
anything. In fact even the manufactuing sheets warn agains placing gold
near amalgams. It should give anyone chills that someone like you is
handling and placing a Hg material in their children and makes monkies
out of people like my
who ever put any trust in their dentist or thought they would have
enough remedial intellegience to appreciate the basic dangers of
the toxic material they were handling.


> On the face of it, that would eliminate the galvanic reaction between
> gold and amalgam.



On the face of it proves your a simpleton. Simpletons shouldn't
handle or regulate Hg containing products



.

Quantcast