Re: Note to Robert Morien

Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
replies to the post). I never use the reply-to field, for obvious
reasons.

And I have never, ever put your name in the to: cc: or bcc: field of any
emails that I have sent or posts that I have posted.


In article <d6YVe.109747$084.33463@attbi_s22>,
"LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> *I never sent those to you*.
>
> So, you say, it appears you did!
>
> *OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
> might have gone to you that way*.
>
> WOW!!!!!!!
>
> The reply to would have went to YOU, not me!!!!!
>
>
>
> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:PhD_failure-E63567.23004313092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <jSJVe.106784$084.69052@attbi_s22>,
> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go, all
> >> three.
> >>
> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> >> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
> >> id <20050913053025q9200k7407e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:30:25 +0000
> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> >> Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:09:05 -0000
> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> >> (208.25.62.167)
> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> >> 23:09:05 -0700
> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> >> Newsgroups:
> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> >> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> >> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
> >> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
> >> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:21 -0700
> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >
> >> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> >> > >> anything.
> >> > >
> >> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> >> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there
> >> > > are
> >> > > a
> >> > > few that deserve being ignored.
> >> > >
> >> > > carabelli
> >> >
> >> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> >> > Dan
> >> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to
> >> > ignore
> >> > the
> >> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
> >> >
> >> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
> >>
> >> I only harass spammers.
> >>
> >> Do you feel harassed?
> >>
> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> >> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
> >> id <20050913052949q9200k4hile>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:29:49 +0000
> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> >> Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:08:29 -0000
> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> >> (208.25.62.167)
> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> >> 23:08:29 -0700
> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> >> Newsgroups:
> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> >> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> >> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
> >> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
> >> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:29:46 -0700
> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-3E5E9C.22294612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >
> >> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
> >> > >
> >> > >>
> >> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can answer
> >> > >> anything.
> >> > >
> >> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the messenger.
> >> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and there
> >> > > are
> >> > > a
> >> > > few that deserve being ignored.
> >> > >
> >> > > carabelli
> >> >
> >> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed dangerous.
> >> > Dan
> >> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to
> >> > ignore
> >> > the
> >> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
> >> >
> >> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
> >>
> >> And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so we
> >> can all understand.
> >>
> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
> >> by sccqmxc93.asp.att.net (sccqmxc93) with SMTP
> >> id <20050913052644q930039800e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:26:44 +0000
> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
> >> Received: (qmail 5068 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005 06:05:24 -0000
> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
> >> (208.25.62.167)
> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
> >> 23:05:24 -0700
> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
> >> Newsgroups:
> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
> >> References: <1h2dzeo.e8vq1f1ba96mjN%stove99pipe@xxxxxxxx>
> >> <Sue.1ux0oo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <1125992435.465797.94100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
> >> <PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>
> >> <PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>
> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:26:37 -0700
> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-003C20.22263712092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > > In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
> >> > > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> > >> news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > >> > In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
> >> > >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
> >> > >> >> >
> >> > >> >> > The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the
> >> > >> >> > physics
> >> > >> >> > department of your local college/university and asking them
> >> > >> >> > this?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the
> >> > >> >> safety
> >> > >> >> of
> >> > >> >> amalgams?
> >> > >> >>
> >> > >> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
> >> > >> >> typical
> >> > >> >> dental
> >> > >> >> amalgams?
> >> > >> >
> >> > >> > I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the safety
> >> > >> of
> >> > >> amalgams?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
> >> > >> typical
> >> > >> dental
> >> > >> amalgams?
> >> > >>
> >> > >> <snip>
> >> > >
> >> > > Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
> >> >
> >> > Afraid not.
> >> >
> >> > The fact is:
> >> >
> >> > You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when you
> >> > refuse to answer them.
> >>
> >> Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
> >> clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him about.
> >>
> >> I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could easily
> >> answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could easily
> >> answer. That makes you a terrorist.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > This is a dental newsgroup.
> >>
> >> are you a dentist?
> >>
> >> >
> >> > You have run out of excuses for not answering.
> >>
> >> I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
> >> irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
> >>
> >> You are here to harass, admit it.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > <snip>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Just what is your position on tampons
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
> > might have gone to you that way.
.