Re: Note to Robert Morien


"Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PhD_failure-2BB773.19542614092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Wrong as usual. If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, it will
> automatically send an email copy of the post to you (when someone
> replies to the post). I never use the reply-to field, for obvious
> reasons.

I have no reply to field on outlook express, just a reply group and a reply
which goes to the poster.
>
> And I have never, ever put your name in the to: cc: or bcc: field of any
> emails that I have sent or posts that I have posted.

The e-mails you sent to me did not have a cc, they were sent directly to me
and anyone can clearly see.

You seem to be weaseling, Robert.

It is clear the e-mails came from you, they were posted both here and sent
to me, privately.


>
>
> In article <d6YVe.109747$084.33463@attbi_s22>,
> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> *I never sent those to you*.
>>
>> So, you say, it appears you did!
>>
>> *OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
>> might have gone to you that way*.
>>
>> WOW!!!!!!!
>>
>> The reply to would have went to YOU, not me!!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:PhD_failure-E63567.23004313092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > In article <jSJVe.106784$084.69052@attbi_s22>,
>> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I had deleted them, but had not deleted the folder, so here you go,
>> >> all
>> >> three.
>> >>
>> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
>> >> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
>> >> id <20050913053025q9200k7407e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:30:25
>> >> +0000
>> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
>> >> Received: (qmail 5149 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005
>> >> 06:09:05 -0000
>> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
>> >> (208.25.62.167)
>> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
>> >> 23:09:05 -0700
>> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
>> >> Newsgroups:
>> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
>> >> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
>> >> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
>> >> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
>> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
>> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
>> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:30:21 -0700
>> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-5F0FE4.22302112092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
>> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
>> >> > >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can
>> >> > >> answer
>> >> > >> anything.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the
>> >> > > messenger.
>> >> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and
>> >> > > there
>> >> > > are
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > few that deserve being ignored.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > carabelli
>> >> >
>> >> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed
>> >> > dangerous.
>> >> > Dan
>> >> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to
>> >> > ignore
>> >> > the
>> >> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
>> >> >
>> >> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
>> >>
>> >> I only harass spammers.
>> >>
>> >> Do you feel harassed?
>> >>
>> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
>> >> by sccqmxc92.asp.att.net (sccqmxc92) with SMTP
>> >> id <20050913052949q9200k4hile>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:29:49
>> >> +0000
>> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
>> >> Received: (qmail 5138 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005
>> >> 06:08:29 -0000
>> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
>> >> (208.25.62.167)
>> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
>> >> 23:08:29 -0700
>> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
>> >> Newsgroups:
>> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
>> >> References: <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
>> >> <fijai1hpq8cade25ng7rv00pkc9sqlkpki@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <qUmVe.325137$x96.224368@attbi_s72>
>> >> <PhD_failure-4FE6FD.17082912092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>
>> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
>> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
>> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:29:46 -0700
>> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-3E5E9C.22294612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> In article <G6qVe.325493$x96.71481@attbi_s72>,
>> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > "carabelli" <huerter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > news:yEpVe.236179$5N3.189115@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...........
>> >> > >
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> what is your position on tampons. I need to know before I can
>> >> > >> answer
>> >> > >> anything.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > There is a distinct difference between the message and the
>> >> > > messenger.
>> >> > > There are a few messengers here that deserve all they get, and
>> >> > > there
>> >> > > are
>> >> > > a
>> >> > > few that deserve being ignored.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > carabelli
>> >> >
>> >> > It would like to be ignored that mercury amalgams are indeed
>> >> > dangerous.
>> >> > Dan
>> >> > like to ignore the truth. Dan was caught LYING. Dan would like to
>> >> > ignore
>> >> > the
>> >> > *truth*, just as ALL the dentists here, except Steve Bornfeld.
>> >> >
>> >> > The truth is Robert is here to harass, so he fits in well with Dan.
>> >>
>> >> And you don't call what you do harassing? Please define harassment so
>> >> we
>> >> can all understand.
>> >>
>> >> Received: from smtp.inreach.com ([209.142.2.36])
>> >> by sccqmxc93.asp.att.net (sccqmxc93) with SMTP
>> >> id <20050913052644q930039800e>; Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:26:44
>> >> +0000
>> >> X-Originating-IP: [209.142.2.36]
>> >> Received: (qmail 5068 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2005
>> >> 06:05:24 -0000
>> >> Received: from [208.25.62.167] (HELO 208-25-62-167.stk.inreach.net)
>> >> (208.25.62.167)
>> >> by smtp.inreach.com (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2005
>> >> 23:05:24 -0700
>> >> From: Robert Morien <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> To: "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> Subject: Re: Faradaic Activity in Dental Amalgams
>> >> Newsgroups:
>> >> sci.med.dentistry,sci.physics.electromag,sci.physics,sci.materials
>> >> References: <1h2dzeo.e8vq1f1ba96mjN%stove99pipe@xxxxxxxx>
>> >> <Sue.1ux0oo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <1125992435.465797.94100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-C2EC0D.01180506092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <rvkuh1l0or4gi1jichluur62p6kvkccolj@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-0C2C75.15195707092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <PdKTe.315138$x96.35427@attbi_s72> <Sue.1v0i1y@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <bo29i15p9ee36fail7ekvt9is5aftftnu9@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <1126473632.653316.47500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <4m4ai1p0n7ma7t4qd8e46bnil5danshhnt@xxxxxxx>
>> >> <PhD_failure-21EEF9.23284411092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>
>> >> <PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>
>> >> <PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>
>> >> Posted-And-Mailed: yes
>> >> User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.4 (PPC Classic)
>> >> Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 22:26:37 -0700
>> >> Message-ID: <PhD_failure-003C20.22263712092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>
>> >> In article <fepVe.325305$x96.150355@attbi_s72>,
>> >> "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > news:PhD_failure-B51906.17074612092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > > In article <r0nVe.326222$_o.311376@attbi_s71>,
>> >> > > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> > >> news:PhD_failure-3F6BD1.14345812092005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> > >> > In article <5E9Ve.345031$xm3.307508@attbi_s21>,
>> >> > >> > "LadyLollipop" <LadyLollipop@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> >> "Robert Morien" <PhD_failure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> >> > >> >> >
>> >> > >> >> > The real question is: Keith, why aren't you going to the
>> >> > >> >> > physics
>> >> > >> >> > department of your local college/university and asking them
>> >> > >> >> > this?
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the
>> >> > >> >> safety
>> >> > >> >> of
>> >> > >> >> amalgams?
>> >> > >> >>
>> >> > >> >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
>> >> > >> >> typical
>> >> > >> >> dental
>> >> > >> >> amalgams?
>> >> > >> >
>> >> > >> > I see you continue to support Keith in his useless complaints.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> OOOPPPPPSSSSS.
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> The real questions are Robert: What is*your* position on the
>> >> > >> safety
>> >> > >> of
>> >> > >> amalgams?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> What is *your* position on the electromagnetic properties of
>> >> > >> typical
>> >> > >> dental
>> >> > >> amalgams?
>> >> > >>
>> >> > >> <snip>
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Nope. you see my position on anything is irrelevent...
>> >> >
>> >> > Afraid not.
>> >> >
>> >> > The fact is:
>> >> >
>> >> > You have no right to grill Keith over and over with questions, when
>> >> > you
>> >> > refuse to answer them.
>> >>
>> >> Who are you to tell me this? Keith asks questions that Keith could
>> >> clearly answer yet chooses not to. That is worth questioning him
>> >> about.
>> >>
>> >> I take it that you support Keiths right to ask questions he could
>> >> easily
>> >> answer, but you don't support my right to ask questions he could
>> >> easily
>> >> answer. That makes you a terrorist.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > This is a dental newsgroup.
>> >>
>> >> are you a dentist?
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > You have run out of excuses for not answering.
>> >>
>> >> I haven't made any excuses for not answering. You questions are
>> >> irrelevent and not worthy of an answer.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > You have clearly shown, you are here to harass.
>> >>
>> >> You are here to harass, admit it.
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > <snip>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Just what is your position on tampons
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I never sent those to you. OTOH if you use the reply-To: field, they
>> > might have gone to you that way.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Note to Robert Morien
    ... If YOU use the reply-to field when posting, ... > The e-mails you sent to me did not have a cc, they were sent directly to me ... > You seem to be weaseling, Robert. ... also said I have never put your email addy in the to: cc: or bcc: field ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: You can choose to cancel this again or have a friendly settlement
    ... Robert Love wrote: ... I don't know why you keep posting this stuff. ... I won't stop until Rudy fixes his error. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.non-technical)
  • Re: the 1st law and reference frames
    ... I am sure he did not intend to offend anyone by posting something ... Robert B. winn ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Network cable unplugged
    ... Thanks for posting this, Robert. ... Then I replaced my ethernet card and it fixed the problem. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
  • Re: F/T HUO Shadow
    ... Kevin and John...Thanks for posting about the machine. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (rec.games.pinball)