Re: Licensure by Credentials

On Sat, 01 Oct 2005 12:31:48 GMT, Amatus Cremona <nicola@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>>
>>DO YOU KNOW IF IT APPLIEES to graduates from non-US dental schools HOLDING
>>A CALIFORNIA DDS LICENSE?
>>
>
> Does not apply
>
> Amatus

You know, the confusion arises because they are allowing
non-US-dentists to take the California exam, but I think they are
flunking each and every one of them.

It helps the economy .. .tutors ,,, hotel stays ,,, patients ,,,,,,
exam fees.

Joel


>
>On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 06:44:37 GMT, "ADENTIST" <dds@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>DO YOU KNOW IF IT APPLIEES to graduates from non-US dental schools HOLDING
>>A CALIFORNIA DDS LICENSE?
>>"Tony Bad" <spamspamspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:1uRye.151418$t07.59567@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Was reading a newsletter from the ADA that says 47 states now allow
>>> licensure by credentials if you have been practicing for 5+ years...I
>>> hadn't
>>> realized the # was that high, but it is about damn time.
>>>
>>> The only remaining holdouts are Florida, South Carolina, and
>>> Delaware...the
>>> last one was a bit of a surprise to me. I know Florida wants to protect
>>> its
>>> citizens from all us bad dentists who want to retire down there...and
>>> doesn't SC still fly the confederate flag?...but Delaware?? I thought
>>> Delaware played nice with others?
>>>
>>> Any particular reason Delaware is a holdout?
>>>
>>> T
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>..
>
>Amatus
>
> .

.