Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: "StovePipe" <stove99pipe@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Oct 2005 22:12:47 -0700
Amatus Cremona a écrit :
> >
> > Nonetheless, this employee of SP's has *stolen* from him !
> > He could have her arrested, but I suppose firing her, changing
> > the locks, etc. would suffice for him.
> >
>
> I agree 100%, but get the impression that SP is not yet calloused by such
> occurrences to react as you and I would. I would tell the lady to go home
> the moment I have any proof, with the promise of owed wages to follow by
> weeks end, and court summons to follow that if enough solid proof is found.
> Locks get changed as quickly as I can get a locksmith out. The more staff
> who witness this the better. That way they know they will not be getting
> away with anything, either.
My plan exactly, and also they will be witnesses in the event that
this... 'Individual' decides to accuse me of assault or whatever.
>
> In the past, .... I never complain about not feeling perfect, and neither do
> they. Plus, they get to see that I can actually function without them in
> the office, so they realize that the likelihood of holding me hostage over
> some issue is rather remote.
Why do you think I'm getting the XL routines going???? And making a
point of telling the other two that they must also know how to use
it???? There is no indespensible man....
Danka
SP
=ECHO(true)
.
- References:
- Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: StovePipe
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: Amatus Cremona
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: StovePipe
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: Amatus Cremona
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: Amatus Cremona
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: W_B
- Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- From: Amatus Cremona
- Freeze.Panes revisited
- Prev by Date: Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- Next by Date: Re: Robert Kulacz, D.D.S.- Contact Informayion
- Previous by thread: Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- Next by thread: Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|