Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:23:03 -0400
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:11:29 GMT, Rich.@. wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:54:03 +0100, Ann <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 22:41:01 GMT, Rich.@. wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 23:08:01 +0100, Ann <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I think if I came to a group and found that nobody agreed with my line
>>>>of thinking, after a short while I'd move on and leave them alone.
>>>
>>>But Jan is finding that someone agrees with her line of thinking.
>>>Clinton for example is one. And there have been several others.
>>>
>>>
Being a dental group, people come here seeking advice about their root
canal therapy. While free speech is always allowed, some people like
to tell the patient they are being poisoned by their root canals and
their dentists and they had best get the teeth ripped out.
If a dentist, you know, licensed by their state to diagnose and offer
dental advice ...., if the dentist says something contrary to the
poisoning they risk losing their internet account or worse!
Joel
>>>
>>>>What do the people who go on and on and get more and more abusive,
>>>>hope to achieve?
>>>
>>>They come here primarily to get validation for their beliefs. IF they
>>>get the validation their beliefs are reinforced. When their beliefs
>>>get rejected or criticized they become angry and abusive. They then
>>>engage in more harassing/abusive/stalking behavior to get the
>>>naysayers to stop confronting them. To a large degree they are
>>>successful as it is not worth the while of many people to put up with
>>>the hassle.
>>>
>>>In their real life they probably get very little or no support from
>>>significant others wrt their health beliefs.
>>>
>>>Jan Drew said that she once went to a peripheral neuropathy support
>>>group. She soon left the group. Take a guess why?
>>>
>>> They come here to get what little support they can. The fact that
>>>they mostly get criticism is not as important as the fact that they
>>>occasionally get support.
>>
>>But you're as much a zealot as she is.
>
>I zealously expose her lies that if believed may get someone into
>serious health trouble.
>
>You don't see a difference between zealously trying to expose the
>misinformation that she regularly posts on usenet and her zealotry??
>
>For you to place someone kind of moral equivalence between Jan Drew
>and myself (both zealots) is one of the reason why Jan becomes so
>emboldened. Congratulations. You are actually increasing the
>likelihood of her continuing to give her very dangerous health
>information.
>
>Watch how she now cuts and pastes your calling me a zealot to then use
>to attack me.
>
>Jan not only gets support from individuals like Clinton but from
>individuals like you, Ann and others. Anyone who confronts someone for
>exposing the lies and hypocrisy of others is enabling the person who
>is spouting the lies. Now you know the answer to your question about
>why these individuals continue to post in an environment where there
>is much criticism.
>
>I had a dear friend die from a curable disease from listening to
>people like Jan Drew. I zealously will expose those people as a public
>service. Sadly you and others criticize me for doing this. I not only
>have to deal with the misinformation spewed by the likes of Jan Drew
>but her various enablers like you.
>
>Aloha,
>
>Rich
>>
>>Ann
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- References:
- Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: LadyLollipop
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: letsconnect
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: Ann
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: Clinton
- Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- From: Ann
- Wake Up Call For Sue
- Prev by Date: Re: The Difference Between a Liar & An Honest Man (was A Wake up Call for Sue)
- Next by Date: Re: Someone Asked, Why Did You Not Have A Drug Problem, When You Were Growning Up?
- Previous by thread: Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- Next by thread: Re: Wake Up Call For Sue
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|