Message From Robert ......
- From: Joel M. Eichen <joeleichen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:56:01 -0500
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Kulacz
To: tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: Dental- Forum
For some reason I am unable to post on the forum. it will not
allow me and I have tried all ways to atempt to correct this situation
and clarify statements made about me.
So I am emailing you.
1. I am no longer in clinical practice. I simply could not afford to
run my office any loinger. The overhead was greater than the
production due to the nature of the people that I treated, the fees
charged, the insurance companies, and the fact that the surgery is so
intense at times you cannot do more than two or a maximum of 3/day/ (
I would not to be the fourth patient so I would not do it)
Many peope were very ill so even perfoming sedation on these patients
was stressful above the norm.
2. I do not do implants (even though I took a 1 year post graduate
training in impalnts years ago( I used to do them but not anymore
whenU was in practice. If I did place implants now I would have made a
lot of money as was correctly stated on the forum. But I do not.
There were issues about placing implants that kept me away from them
until I could be sure was sure of their safety.
3. I am not a member of IAOMT. They may have me on their list and I
was a member, but I have not been involved for years.
4. I was outspoken about the cavitat not being a diagnostic aid very
early on when I saw it in operatrion. That issue alone cost me lots of
referrals.
4. There is no motive to practice the way that I did and try and
educate dentists. No dentist wanted to listen even when the peer
revied papers were placed in front of them.So I ended up managing
these patients surgically and working with thir physicains to help
them manage the follow up. (blood work, hperbaric oxygen, antibiotic
therapy etc)
If you think about it there is not positive reason to do what I did
except to help people that have been searching for answers to their
health problems. If you are not aware of its existence than you cannot
include it in a differential diagnosis.
This happens all of the time in medicine and somewhat in dentistry.
Eventually standard of care moves forward.
I did turn away many people that practically demanded surgery when I
felt that I could not help them.
Most of my time was reviewing history and determing if I could help
diagnose and treat a dental/jawbone relationship to systemic disease.
That led me to the 10 years of research that is impossible to explain
on a forum such as the dental-forum
I have lectured at major pharmaceutical companies when appropiate and
to countless Medial organizations.
The dental groups do not want to listen to this and that is one
reason why you cannot get these type of cases published in a dental
journal. They should be, but they are not even considered.
It also makes no sense to practice as I did. Your peers dislike you,
you basically make no money unless you are a crook (and there are
plenty out there that do similar procedures)., you are open to State
board action run by dentists, and are wide open to lawsuits about
standard of care even with extensive informed consent.
It makes no sense unless you have done EXTENSIVE research and have
seen the clinical result, both subjective and objective.
Sice I cannot post maybe you can post this on the thread. Why dis Endo
( I think that is the title of the thread)
I sometimes wish that I never researced this and learned about ot.
Life would have been a LOT easier as it uswed to be.
But it is our resposibility as professionals to treat patients ans we
would ourselves and our loved ones and be open to data.
It is also important to educate dentist about basic medicine.
Thank you.
Robert Kulacz, D.D.S.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Prednisone
- Next by Date: Re: A question of equipment
- Previous by thread: Re: Prednisone
- Next by thread: Re: Are you in need of dental benefits?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
