Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: "Clinton" <clintonz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Nov 2005 20:38:10 -0800
unknown wrote:
> CZ has no idea what we learned in dental school. He has
> no idea what we have learned since dental school.
WRong!! I have a very good idea first hand from dealing with
dentists and oral surgeons.
> He does
> not understand oral infections
How would you know. You think because you spent a couple years
in a classroom and did a few fillings and extractions your a guru?
> or dental materials.
I'm sure I know a lot more about amalgam than you. Why don't you tell
me a calcualtion for the vapor pressure of amalgam or give me an upper
limit on corrosion or Hg release. You can't.....why is that with all
your
advanced dental school training?
> He has
> simply gone to the fringes of the profession to find someone
> that supports his ideas.
More unformed drivel and misguided specualtion and as usual you've got
it
reversed. First my main concern is with amalgam.
Second from the resulting dental infection from the material which
is supposed to be stable I have witnessed FIRST HAND another
entire area of incompetence (as have many other patients)
>>From the oral surgeon who wrote that soft bone is "not indicative of
any disease" to a couple of other dental idiots, including a couple
oral surgeons.
We the patients (in this case dental infection patients) many times are
flushed
out to discover the few dentists and oral surgeons who have a clue.
Think a dentist or oral surgeon won't leave large areas of infection in
your
jaw after an extraction and tell you to "bite me". Guess again.
And if you open your uninformed loud mouth one more time I'm
going to post my CT scan on the forum so you can see what
mainstream denistry does. Hopefully now you'll shut up for good or
at least until you know what you are talking about.
>Dr.K has not shown anything to
> support
> his accusations.
LOL, you don't even know what the accusations are because you haven't
read the book!
Reminds me of a story told by Feyman when he volunteered to help reveiw
books for
the CA eduation board. One publisher didn't go to press in time, but
everyone assumed
that everyone had read the book and based their opinion on what
everyone else said.
Eventually the non-existant book recieved a favorable rating from the
school board.
Your no better because your just an uninformed parrot.
>
> There is some bad endo out there. Even with extra training
> and good technique it isn't 100% successful. It does not
> lead
> to bone infections that can only be found
> by......well....the
> few 'enlightened individuals'.
Complete unsubstantiated drivel. You wouldn't know how to look for
infection in the
jaw and you wouldn't have a clue what studies have been done to support
the safety
of RC..because there are none, just assurances from a few dentists who
arrive
at convienent conclusions by mutal agreement. Many times school just
serves one purpose in my opinion from the MIT researcher who told me
that Global warming was hype to the dentists on this list who
proclaimed "cavitations don't exist", it just gives self confidence to
idiots.
Dr. K is not saying that most RC lead to severe infection .. learn to
read for
comprehension.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Dartos
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- References:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Clinton
- Re: Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: unknown
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- Prev by Date: Re: Freeze.Panes revisited
- Next by Date: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Next by thread: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
