Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: "Tony Bad" <spamspamspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 23:47:29 -0500
<drkulacz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1131755275.448535.153320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I have been following this thread (and others on this forum)
So then, answer my questions regarding why you take such a strong stance
against endo yet your web site and published article don't provide cases
that support your views or provide good evidence of the evils of endodontic
care. Since you are following these threads, you probably recall my
comments. I am presently reading your book, looking for those examples, but
may not have gotten there yet.
You keep hearkening back to the fact you have been attacked and insulted
here, yet you conveniently forget who started the branding of people as
idiots and incompetents.
I am also curious why your book takes so much time and space describing how
ignorant and uninformed other dentists are. Why not just present your
message and let that do the talking? Your posts here have taken the same
approach and as you correctly point out, have led to nothing but a trading
of insults. I'd really like to learn more about your views.
One last question. Why have you always used one path lab...the same one used
by others who share your views? It would seem that the types of pathology
you write about would be easily noted by any pathologist, so the use of a
single lab seems unusual.
T
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: drkulacz
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- References:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Clinton
- Re: Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: unknown
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Clinton
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Dartos
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: drkulacz
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- Prev by Date: Re: Allbond-2 - the best?
- Next by Date: Re: Allbond-2 - the best?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Next by thread: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|