Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Amatus Cremona <nicola@..amanti.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:04:36 GMT
>
>Amatus, all you can answer is " ridiculous." Again you prove my point
>stated in my original post. What is so "ridiculous?"
>
you are.
On 13 Nov 2005 17:07:57 -0800, drkulacz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>Tony Bad wrote:
>> <drkulacz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:1131755275.448535.153320@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > I have been following this thread (and others on this forum)
>>
>> So then, answer my questions regarding why you take such a strong stance
>> against endo yet your web site and published article don't provide cases
>> that support your views or provide good evidence of the evils of endodontic
>> care. Since you are following these threads, you probably recall my
>> comments. I am presently reading your book, looking for those examples, but
>> may not have gotten there yet.
>>
>> You keep hearkening back to the fact you have been attacked and insulted
>> here, yet you conveniently forget who started the branding of people as
>> idiots and incompetents.
>>
>> I am also curious why your book takes so much time and space describing how
>> ignorant and uninformed other dentists are. Why not just present your
>> message and let that do the talking? Your posts here have taken the same
>> approach and as you correctly point out, have led to nothing but a trading
>> of insults. I'd really like to learn more about your views.
>>
>> One last question. Why have you always used one path lab...the same one used
>> by others who share your views? It would seem that the types of pathology
>> you write about would be easily noted by any pathologist, so the use of a
>> single lab seems unusual.
>>
>> T
>
>To T (whatever your real name actually is we will never know since you
>are not brave enough to post it):
>
>I have used more than one lab. And I have had similar reports given on
>my biopsy. I have also used about 3 different labs for culture and
>sensitivity. All report similar findings.
>Have you ever done a biopsy or culture?
>I bet the answer is no. If no, then why not? How are you forming an
>opinion on this subject without reading all of the data?
>
>I would think that you would want to know about this subject since it
>impacts the health of the patients you are treating. I am not saying
>that everyone with a root canal will become ill, but some people will.
>Therefore if this possibility is not presented to the patient then it
>is lack of informed consent. A root canal tooth is is a dead infected
>body part in the bone of the maxilla or mandible. A person may become
>ill right away or some time removed from the root canal procedure
>depending upon factors such as the health of the patients immune
>system, other physical ailments, the pathogenicity of the bacteria
>present, as well as a host of other factors.
>
>The answer to the root canal issue causing or contributing to atypical
>facial pain or a variety of systemic diseases has been published
>extensively for almost 100 years in both the medical and dental
>literature. As I have suggested numerous times, look it up. It is all
>there. The fact is that root canal teeth remain infected whether the
>root canal procedure is performed by an endodontist with the highest
>level of clinical skill, or a dentist with average skill. The tooth is
>porous like a sponge due to the composition of dentin which is composed
>of dentin tubules. Bacteria live in these tubules, accessory canals,
>the main canals (which about 90% of the time still have necrotic
>material left in the apical 3 mm.after root canal completion). Also,
>the infection can travel to the surrounding bone causing chronic
>osteomyelitis and sometimes osteonecrosis.
>
>Some people will become ill and some will not. Many times the causation
>of systemic disease being linked to a root canal is missed because
>dentists continue to propogate the wrong assumption that root canal
>teeth cannot be the cause of a systemic disease or atypical facial
>pain. Many times the patiets with atypical facial pain are referred by
>a dentist, to an internest, then to a neurologist and put on
>medications such as neurontin. I have seen MANY of these patients and
>most of the time I can complete their history for them at the exam
>appointment because so many people have the same similar story.
>
>I do not see why you cannot see this with the abundance of information
>available. If you cannot find it then there is no point in continuing a
>discussion because you lack the knowledge of the subject. Again, I
>would think that you would want to know more about this instead of
>blindly calling my statements false.
>
>Amatus and T have never answered the questions asked regarding mercury,
>anesthetic, infection etc. Simple questions about dentistry/medicine
>that you should know without having to look up the answers. That was
>the point of my original post and you prove me correct.
>
>T, you called some of your collegues a**h*l*s on the thread about the
>problem a person had with two dentists in a row. I guess you do not
>think too highly of some of your peers or you would not have said that.
>
>Amatus, all you can answer is " ridiculous." Again you prove my point
>stated in my original post. What is so "ridiculous?"
>
>Oh well.
>
>RK
...
Amatus
.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: drkulacz
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- References:
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Clinton
- Re: Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: unknown
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Clinton
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Dartos
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: drkulacz
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: Tony Bad
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- From: drkulacz
- Re: The Dr. K Book
- Prev by Date: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Next by Date: Wisdom tooth extraction while fully awake
- Previous by thread: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Next by thread: Re: The Dr. K Book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|