Re: The Dr. K Book


Clinton wrote:
> Amatus Cremona wrote:
> > >
> > >Amatus, all you can answer is " ridiculous." Again you prove my point
> > >stated in my original post. What is so "ridiculous?"
> > >
> >
> > Wrong! you are not worth the time to argue with, as you will never
> > participate in a true discussion.
> >
>
> Groupthink is really an ugly thing, ain't it!

Amatus:

I have attempted a discussion but you do not seem to want that.
You have it all wrong. This is a subject to learn about if we care
about our patients.
If you want to blindly argue your opinion without having reviewed the
research, then you should not be in this profession. You are treating
human beings. The data has been around for 100 years regarding the
effects of root canal teeth on systemic health in some people.
With periodontal disease getting so much attention (as it should),
this should not be a hard concept for a "doctor" to understand.

Alfred Zamm, M.D. writes a column in a Kingson N.Y. paper every month.
On Monday, September 5, 2005, Dr. Zamm wrote a column on the subject of
root canals as a cause of systemic disease.

Your posts never answer any questions put to you. You come into the
discussion with no science to offer and are too lazy or....to look it
up.

You have no academic interest in this subject and out of your fear
comes anger. The results of that anger are reflected in your posts.

I was always happy to have discussions as I welcomed that whenever I
lectured on this topic.

I always told my patients that the three words that I use the most are
I don't know.
The more I learned the more I realized how much I do not know.

You seem to already know it all so there is no point in a discussion.
Your posts do not show an interest in the subject matter. Instead they
reflect only an interest in keeping your mind closed on this topic.

It is the layperson or the physicians that are interested as well as
the unfortunate person that becomes ill from a dental procedure and is
then passed from doctor to doctor. Very rarely will a dentist enter
into an open discussion. Most of the time they behave like you.

Until the minds of dentists are open, we cannot have a discussion.

You are calling me a liar. You are calling all the patients who are
currently ill liars. You are ignoring and/or discrediting all of the
past research on this subject performed by top scientists.

Well, you seem to know it all so you are right about a discssion being
a waste of time.

RK

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Now We Know Who Ate All The Coronation Street Pies!
    ... Definition of stalking ... Most of those posts seek to end stalking. ... Alex Buell has just turned up there to post some nonsense about flies ... Any sane and reasonable person would argue that not only ...
    (uk.media.tv.misc)
  • Re: TD - why do people keep responding? A query
    ... Moses didn't argue about the Ten Commandments either... ... Now you know why I don't respond to his posts - please let me know ... He's as entitled as anyone to his opinions, ... newsgroup need to check their zipcode. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • TD - why do people keep responding? A query
    ... newsgroup to keep trying to argue with Mr. Deacon or to respond to his ... I have yet to see any meaningful exchange of confliction ... Moses didn't argue about the Ten Commandments either... ... Now you know why I don't respond to his posts - please let me know ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: On Top Posting and its dissenters.
    ... I said I prefer READING top posts. ... You might as well argue that I shouldn't like chocolate. ... I have been a usenet regular since 1997. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: WGA Aint So Bad
    ... to go to this point based on what I was reading in your posts. ... This is just sad, Alias. ... I'll argue with anyone about anything. ... will be intellectually honest with me. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)