Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: "Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-spam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 17:24:08 -0800
Man W_B it doesn't get any better than that. Gotta love that coup de grâce.
"Whamatus_B" <no_one@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vh5kq1p20o5g4pt91c6a3li1l0he1qlgaf@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Dear Regs,
> Please scroll down to examine a masterful dissection.
>
> Assuredly not boring, and maybe mildly entertaining.
> At least for 32 seconds or so...
>
> On 21 Dec 2005 15:23:22 -0800, "Sue" <chrlie699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Whamatus_B wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:17:37 -0800, "Tim Dixon"
>>> <timgdixon-no-spam@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >What is to understand Sue when you make statements like this:
>>> >
>>> >"Theory Only: I would venture to guess that the onset of pain
>>> >associated with TMJ disorder is due to "parafunctional overuse" of the
>>> >muscles that control mandibular function as Boyd describes. (As I
>>> >understand, this includes bruxism and grinding due to poor
>>> >parasympathetic tone, thus affecting muscle relaxation... an essential
>>> >component in normal chewing function)."
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> The Sympathetic and Parasympathetic nervous systems control
>>> involutary smooth musculature.
>>>
>>> Skeletal muscles are innervated by, you guessed it motor nerves.
>>>
>>> Sue's 'theory' not only nonsense, it's complete and utter bullsh*t.
>>> --
>>>
>>> Whamatus
>
> OK regs, I'm gonna bite.
> Pay attention and you just may learn something.
>
>>
>>Whamatus - Thank you!
>
> Don't thank me yet.
>
>>Now we are getting some discussion.
>
> No, not really; simply correcting your erroneous ass-umptions.
>
>> Yes. This is what I understood as well.
>
> Ass-umes facts not in evidence.
> There is *no* evidence that you even passingly understand
> the subject matter. Your education of human neuroanatomy
> is severely deficient.
>
>>I understood the masticatory muscles to be
>>controle dby motor nerves.
>
> All skeletal muscles are innervated by motor neurons.
> There are also sensory afferent neurons present in skeletal muscle.
>
>>That was why the discussion on DT was so
>>interesting.
>
> Some find watching grass grow, or paint dry *interesting*.
>
> Based on their ad-rag, I consider it a MMS publication.
> (That's mutual masturbation society for you folks in Rio Linda)
> In the common slang vernacular, a circle jerk.
>>
>>The dentists on Dentaltown brought up automonic function and its
>>potential role in the parafunction associated with TMJ disorders.
>>
> That's about as interesting as watching a snail crawl.
>
>>As I mentioned, my theory is theory only, as I prefaced in the post. I
>>present theory, fully expecting to be challenged on that theory. Thank
>>you for your input. It helps me learn.
>>
>
> You must first have a basis, on solid scientific ground,
> *before* you postulate a 'theory'.
> You have none of the pre-requisites to even form a valid
> scientific premise.
>
>>What causes involuntary bruxing and grinding at night?
>
> No one yet knows the answer to that question.
> If anyone did, we could treat the disorder.
>
>> In your
>>opinion, what role does the autonomic nervous system play in this
>>parafunction, if any?
>
> Zero, zip, nada... etc.
>
> The Autonomic Nervous System functions of the human mouth
> are largely limited to salivary flow control, gag reflex, and
> partially swallowing.
> Some may include the 'sucking reflex' of a nursing baby.
>>
>>Thank you,
>>Sue
>>PS How would you describe the "chewing reflex?" What causes this
>>reflex? What causes reflex inhibition of the muscles that control
>>chewing..allowing for the jaw to drop? Thanks.
>
> There is no such thing as a 'chewing reflex'.
> Hence your next two questions are irrelevant.
>
> The only <'reflex'> that I'm aware of during the chewing cycle
> is when there is a foreign object impinged upon by erupted teeth.
> i.e. bone fragments, shot, or other hard objects.
>
> It is debatable if this is truly an *opening* <'reflex'> at all, or
> a learned behavior.
>
> BTW once the bolus is swallowed the Autonomic peristalsis
> takes over.
>
> Now for the coup de grâce.
>
> Sue, you are a very lonely person, and a textbook example
> of the 'savior syndrome'.
>
> Your so called 'knowledge' is severely limited; therefore you
> augment your attempts at spurring relevant discussions
> by interjecting words that you have gleaned from the internet,
> SMD and, (gasp) DT.
>
> You rarely even post an original thought.
> Your pitiful cries for attention fall upon deaf ears;
> and this disturbs you immensely
>
> Attempts to discourage you from your newsgroup
> behavior only serve to encourage your neurosis.
> And only acts to increase your need for attention,
> and hence more posting.
>
> If you really seek knowledge about dentistry,
> go to f*ckin' Dental School already !
>
> I don't feel sorry for you, because only *you* can change yourself
> and/or your situation. You ain't gonna find sympathy or agreement
> here sister, unless you are fluent in the language and concepts.
>
> On a final note, do not expect me to respond any further;
> have wasted enough of my precious time on you.
> Seek your need for acceptance from within, not from the outside.
>
> If you need a friend that badly,
>
> ...buy a dog.
>
> --
> Whamatus
> Take out the G'RBAGE
> wubbabubbazG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: JanD
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- References:
- Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Tim Dixon
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Tim Dixon
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Whamatus_B
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Prev by Date: Re: Tim's Campaign of Intimidation
- Next by Date: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Previous by thread: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Next by thread: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|