diet soda vs sugared soda
- From: "James H White" <notreahgh6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:19:54 -0000
Hello.
I'm wondering if anyone here can clear this up as there seems to be some
controversy over the subject.
But what is it within regular 'Cola' drinks that causes the tooth decay
Is it:-
1) The sugar not the acid. The sugar sticks to the teeth, then bacteria
living within the plaque on the teeth metabolise it steadily producing an
acid, like a factory, around the tooth that then erodes the enamel.
2) Or is it the acid within the drink in the form of phosphoric and carbolic
(I think the CO2 reacts with the water to form this acid) I know that Cola
drinks are pretty acidic with a Ph of around 4. Some claim it is this rather
than the sugar that causes the bulk of the damage. Others maintain that the
acid within the drinks don't stick to the teeth and are quickly swallowed
and any lingering acidity is quickly neutralised by saliva. Unlike the acid
produced by the bacteria in plaque as a by-product of metabolising sugar.
This acid is highly localised around the teeth and is constantly being
generated until all the sugar has been used.
Which scenario is correct, if any, and if both play a part how are they
rated i.e is it the phosphoric acid that does 90% and the
sugar-bacteria-acid pathway that does the remaining 10% etc?
Thanks.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: diet soda vs sugared soda
- From: MSE
- Re: diet soda vs sugared soda
- From: George Chatzipetros
- Re: diet soda vs sugared soda
- Prev by Date: Re: Live molar 'root' poking through gum
- Next by Date: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Previous by thread: Tim's Campaign of Intimidation
- Next by thread: Re: diet soda vs sugared soda
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|