Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation

Stovepipe wrote:
> Sue <chrlie699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Yet. I also incorrectly described the "chewing reflex" as a response to
> > ANS activation...namely the parasympathic causes relfex inhibition of
> > the of teh muscles of mastication.
> >
> > BIG mistake. Dumb assumption on my part. But I was NOT stating as
> > fact. I was only stating as THEORY (in attempt to discuss and learn).
> >
> > Anway, that set off Whamatus.
> >
> > I have since reviewed my physiology and understand the 5th cranial
> > nerve (trigeminal) is both sensory/motor. However stimulation of the
> > hypothalmus, amygdala and even the cerebral cortex in areas near taste
> > sense can cause chewing.
>
> Sue:
>
> Firstly, SabraTW said she was putting The Book back up in the other
> group for downloading for those who wanted it over the Holidays. I
> didn't check, as I already have read it.
>
> If you _did_ take it down and read it, you'd know that Sabra, Tim,
> Dartos and Carebelli have been around these here UseNet parts since
> UseNet was THE way to communicate over the 'Net. We're talkin' S.L.O.W
> connections over modems on rinky-dink computers, even before hard disks
> were the norm. This means that these dude(ette)s have experience with
> people on line and thence into real life. If people like them get their
> backs up at what you are doing here, I have to take notice of that in a
> serious way. To be sure, some of 'em are quicker to get hot under the
> collar than others, but if, together, they find fault with your stuff,
> maybe it isn't smoke. I say MAYBE, as I'm not convinced you are here to
> serve other interests.
>
> I _would_ say that your health sciences background is not really an
> asset much, as we are not by and large neuropharmacological
> practitioners. We treat surgically rather than medically for the most
> part.
>
> If you could get some basic training before posting again, that would
> help.
>
> Cheers
> SP
> --
> Take out the TRAASH to reply

SP,

I would sure like to know what "other interests" you all are talking
about. WHAT OTHER INTERESTS? Tim keeps saying "we are on to you
Sue." On to what? What am I accused of? I have not got a frickin clue
what they think I am out for.

Why can't they articulate their position?

Thanks,
Sue

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: dentalcom.net - smd gateway
    ... Tim Dixon Wrote: ... I can't comment on your questions to Amatus, ... but rather the system of UseNet. ... Sue ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Sues campaign of misinformation
    ... I was only stating as THEORY. ... >> Sue: ... >> UseNet was THE way to communicate over the 'Net. ... and i think you are getting your taste of it now. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Sues campaign of misinformation
    ... Sue wrote: ... I also incorrectly described the "chewing reflex" as a response to ... I was only stating as THEORY. ... UseNet was THE way to communicate over the 'Net. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: IMO
    ... For a country where people sue ... Any person, or company, that trusts the usenet ... a firewall is only as good as the rule set. ... ..and the rule set is only as good as the person maintaining it. ...
    (comp.security.firewalls)
  • Tim & Webbys Nasty Campaign
    ... They are up to no good, and they is on a campaign of disinformation and LIES ... Tim has made this claim, now let's see if he can show us MY EXACT WORDS. ... Just don't know when to shut up do ya, Timmy? ... Oh, I don't think you're so smart, Sue. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)