Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: "Tim Dixon" <timgdixon-no-spam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:19:18 -0800
"Sue" <chrlie699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1135375754.131850.136680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Stovepipe wrote:
>> Sue <chrlie699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Yet. I also incorrectly described the "chewing reflex" as a response to
>> > ANS activation...namely the parasympathic causes relfex inhibition of
>> > the of teh muscles of mastication.
>> >
>> > BIG mistake. Dumb assumption on my part. But I was NOT stating as
>> > fact. I was only stating as THEORY (in attempt to discuss and learn).
>> >
>> > Anway, that set off Whamatus.
>> >
>> > I have since reviewed my physiology and understand the 5th cranial
>> > nerve (trigeminal) is both sensory/motor. However stimulation of the
>> > hypothalmus, amygdala and even the cerebral cortex in areas near taste
>> > sense can cause chewing.
>>
>> Sue:
>>
>> Firstly, SabraTW said she was putting The Book back up in the other
>> group for downloading for those who wanted it over the Holidays. I
>> didn't check, as I already have read it.
>>
>> If you _did_ take it down and read it, you'd know that Sabra, Tim,
>> Dartos and Carebelli have been around these here UseNet parts since
>> UseNet was THE way to communicate over the 'Net. We're talkin' S.L.O.W
>> connections over modems on rinky-dink computers, even before hard disks
>> were the norm. This means that these dude(ette)s have experience with
>> people on line and thence into real life. If people like them get their
>> backs up at what you are doing here, I have to take notice of that in a
>> serious way. To be sure, some of 'em are quicker to get hot under the
>> collar than others, but if, together, they find fault with your stuff,
>> maybe it isn't smoke. I say MAYBE, as I'm not convinced you are here to
>> serve other interests.
>>
>> I _would_ say that your health sciences background is not really an
>> asset much, as we are not by and large neuropharmacological
>> practitioners. We treat surgically rather than medically for the most
>> part.
>>
>> If you could get some basic training before posting again, that would
>> help.
>>
>> Cheers
>> SP
>> --
>> Take out the TRAASH to reply
>
> SP,
>
> I would sure like to know what "other interests" you all are talking
> about. WHAT OTHER INTERESTS? Tim keeps saying "we are on to you
> Sue." On to what? What am I accused of? I have not got a frickin clue
> what they think I am out for.
>
> Why can't they articulate their position?
I have made it perfectly clear to you what you are doing. And so we have
moved beyond that, and i think you are getting your taste of it now.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Tim's campaign of misinformation
- From: JanD
- Re: Tim's campaign of misinformation
- References:
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: letsconnect
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Dartos
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Tim Dixon
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Dartos
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: letsconnect
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Tim Dixon
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: The Webby
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Tim Dixon
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: The Webby
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Stovepipe
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Stovepipe
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- From: Sue
- Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Tim Dixon Obsessed with Sue?
- Next by Date: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Previous by thread: Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation
- Next by thread: Re: Tim's campaign of misinformation
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|