Re: Sue's campaign of misinformation

Sue <chrlie699@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Why can't they articulate their position?
>
> Thanks,
> Sue

I, for one, think that's fair enough. If you know what you're being
blamed for, you can atleast answer to it. There are those who accuse you
of cross posting at the expense of the OP's in question. Just look at
what the other ...individual... is doing with old news; raking it back
up as cannon fodder to hurl back at the OP in question, and reporting
him for out-of-context opinions. This is one of the reasons that Amatus
has a disclaimer in his signature.

You are also being accused of being a savior: one who tries to look good
by throwing up a desparately-needed bit of info for some (apparantly)
distraugh poster on some other forum. Again, this is being done without
the OP's premission; and legal or not, the OP doesn't have to like or
permit it. If you keep doing that, you will find yourself in a vacuum
like some others almost did when it got to be too exaggerated.

The SMD cannot block you; but you are already in the Kill Files of quite
a few of the regs.

If you REALLY want to help, show the other forums the address for the
SMD, and let them come here. _We_ don't piggy-back _them_, and they have
no business doing it to _us_.

Another thing that _I_ would like to know is why a non-dentist like
yourself still hangs around. There arer other non-dentist regs, but they
have a history here. From what I can see, you really don't, and as I
said, we are not neuro-psycho-pharmacologists here. Most of us avoid
prescriptions until really necessary.
SP
--
Take out the TRAASH to reply
.

Relevant Pages
Loading