Re: The DANGERS of Root Canals

Alexander Vasserman DDS wrote:
> What is your scientific background and what degree do you hold? Because
> I have a science degree in addition to my DDS.


Here you go worrying about titles and degrees. I've attempted to hold
meaningful scientific disscussions many times.

not with me.

Believe me i know enough
physics.

why do we need to believe you. What are your credentials???


You've been posting here for what 2 years with no meaningful
comments or research on amalgam other than you don't place them, and
now all your concerned about is titles.

I've been posting here since 1994.
I haven't seen anything meaningful come out of your posts.


> And I have attempted many times to hold meaningful discussions on
> materials
> issues and other dental issues, but no luck. Guess why?
maybe your posts are just too absurd.

Anyway why
> should anyone have to get a dental degree to discuss science or even
> discuss medical/dental issues.
Again you can discuss anything you want but don't claim to be an
authority on the subject when you do not have the credentials. It's
common sense and if you don't understand that then there is not much I
can do for you. I am finding this discussion pointless and very boring.

> You can discuss all you want without a degree, but to post junk in the



First I don't post junk. I rarely post any links and when I do, such as

the
article on miromercuralism people have actually thanked me. Second
what gives you the right to label any posts junk without giving a
reason.
Oh, let me guess, you "earned" that right because you managed to
graduate
from dental school.
Yes. the discussion is about my field which I am regarded as an expert
in and I have credentials to prove it.


> forum and falsely mislead the public and tell a dental professional how
> to practice denistry is out of line.


Most of the discussion has nothing to do with dentistry, they are
materials
issues.
Jan just posted her wacked version of the hazzards of rct and
recommended extraction and you just jumped in to her defense without
even reading her links. Very logical of you isn't it????

So why you insist that only someone with a "dental degree" can
discuss materials is beyond me.
Qualified people can discuss materials, the issue here was about
treatment planing but I guess you did not read that either, how
pathetic.

Especially since these discussions have
been going on for years with little comment from you.
SO.

> Part of earning your say on the
> matter is knowing when to listen and ask questions because regardless
> of your science background your knowledge of dentistry and the body is
> very limited and until you have a DDS/DMD or MD or equivelent behind
> your name your words on the subject have meaningless value.


I think the amount of Hg generated by amalgam is VERY relevant.
according
to you it is only relevant or understanble if one has a DDS/MD or
equivalent.
That's real logical.

Again you go off on a tangent.

These comments are little more than a transparent attempt to silence
anybody
who isn't a clone of you or your collegues. Do you think people reading

this
list are that stupid?

I can not comment on reader's intelligence but yours leaves a lot to be
desired.



> Learn to learn. Titles are a representation of your effort to learn.
> And frankly if you do not have any titles, and you claim the absurd who
> do you expect to respect you???



How do you know what my educational background is? I will judge you on
what you say, nothing else.

Why are you reluctant to post it, did you buy it online???

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The DANGERS of Root Canals
    ... > What is your scientific background and what degree do you hold? ... > I have a science degree in addition to my DDS. ... Here you go worrying about titles and degrees. ... First I don't post junk. ...
    (sci.med.dentistry)
  • Re: Louisiana: Jindal signs creationism bill into law
    ... by Bill Barrow, The Times-Picayune ... advice about how he should deal with the Louisiana Science Education ... that will allow local school boards to approve supplemental materials ... going to teach as an alternative to evolution, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Arkansas: Panel to consider evolution critique
    ... ROGERS - The School Board president wants a district committee to ... committee then would recommend whether to incorporate the materials ... The statement came after the School Board approved 21 science ... both supports and refutes evolution. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Over to Aristotle Re: My views on evolution
    ... >>>I mean, those early forfathers tried very hard to get science to work, ... >>>but even though people like Aristotle were great genius's, ... > Aristotle discussed the nature of materials in terms of their balances ... > But his classification as to what material properties _were_ was very ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Fork survived, head tube didnt!
    ... if you want to make meat out of that typo mr. modulus, try omitting the formula - because that gives the correct answer. ... The science was wrong since you based it on elastic deformation calculation that was wrong. ... gross scientific error, compounded by further gross scientific error after what should have been a period in which corrective research could have been conducted, all spiced up with lies and lunatic moon howlings! ... After your "materials lecture more than 30 years ago", your defining "inclusion" from a textbook, and your reading of textbook intros and Pop Science mags. ...
    (rec.bicycles.tech)
Quantcast