Re: The DANGERS of Root Canals


Alexander Vasserman DDS wrote:
> > ll root cancel fillings have the potential to casue bad health.
> > Not for the past 30 years
>
>
> So, you say!
>
> Others DDS'S, MD'S and RESEARCHERS do NOT.
>
>
> Then the argument is between them and myself. You are not qualified to
> interpret anyone's research.



Jan is posting in America! In America you have the right to post and
say what you want!!!. You don't have to have a dental degree to offer
an opinion on a dental subject!!!! Especially if your jaw has been
ruined by dentistry.

The public is the conscience of the country and only needs logic and
common sense to ask meaningful questions. It's called DEMOCRACY. That's
how the jury system works too. Ordinary people can and do weigh complex
issues. They don't have to have a degree in every issue they
deliberate. But according to Vasser that probably means the US jury
system is corrupt too.


In fact, in the US look at all the stay at home Moms who have
become activists on various issues over the years and contributed to
many
issues, such as enviromental causes, diseases such as autism, political
corruption etc. According to Vasser they should shut up, because they
don't have degrees in nuclear energy, medicine political science etc.
So they are not qualified to comment in public on these issues or
debate
with "experts" and certainly would not be educated enough to sit on a
jury to decide these issues. To heck with them and to heck with the
public say's Vasser, even when he knows that the research done on many
of these issues by dental organizations is NONEXISTENT has been 100%
wrong in the past and that the medical/scientific training of most
dentists is a joke! Let the cluess, greedy, financially driven experts
decide you fate and run you health and country into the ground, becasue
they possess the right "credentials" so they have the "right" to shove
anything in your mouth they want including Hg, and of course you as a
memeber of the public always have the option to *** it out the Hg at
least, if you wish.

As for me I have already posted my educational background which is
excellent. You've been reading this list since 1994 but you missed that
I guess. By the way I was also a member of MENSA which can be proven
easily. Are you a member of such a selective society? If not, I
conclude that you don't have the intelligence to hold a meaningful
discussion and thus don't have the right to offer your opinion on
anything pertaining to the safety of dental procedues. Prove to me that
you have the intelligence to be WORTHY of discussing these issues and
then we will talk. Hah


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually, Jan I do recall now that strangley enough Vasser has not
offered
much comment on amalgam. That is very odd. AND, I did read his website
a year or two ago. I don't know if he has the same information on it
but it actually struck me as strongly leaning toward the anti-amalgam
side in a sneaky way, under the pretense that newer materials were
better for cosmetic dentistry, and it was an inescapable fact that
amalgam does release Hg and
so on. But he must do many RC which would explain his defensiveness on
this issue!

.

Quantcast