Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
- From: jdennell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 19 Mar 2006 12:55:15 -0800
I just received a letter from my son's orthodontist insisting I pay
$75.00 a month until braces are removed. He letter states "The 13
months of unnecessary prolongation of his treatment has been due to his
lack of cooperation." I have been at every appointment my son has had
and have been spoken to two times. (His office policy does not allow
parents in the treatment room. I must rely on my son to inform me of
his instructions, per the orthodontist.) Once was to inform me that my
son was not brushing correctly. The second time, a year into
treatment, was to inform me that his wisdom teeth needed to be removed
and his molars in front of the wisdom teeth has not completed erupted
through the gums. Bands could not be placed on these teeth. (My son was
14 at the time.) The surgery was performed, by the oral surgeon the
orthodontist recommended, about a month later. The oral surgeon
informed me that the surgery was more involved than he anticipated,
alot of bone and tissue removal. He went back to the orthodontist a
month later and did not have another appointment for two months. The
orthodontist claims treatment was to take 20 months and I signed a
"contract" stating this. What I signed is a payment agreement, I had
20 months to pay the outstanding balance. It is called a "Federal
Truth In Lending Disclousre Statement For Professional Services
Rendered". He has highlight a section of this form about unncessary
prolongation of treatment due to patient's uncooperation, braking of
appliances and missing appointments resulting in additonal fees. He
has given me three options: Pay the additonal amount (for how long?),
transfer to another orthodontist, or sign a release to have his braces
removed. I have spent over $6,000 for his treatment (including first
phase by another orthodontist). What should I do? The letter claims
my son's teeth are aligned but his bite is not corrected. (He wore a
very thick wire for months prior to wearing a rubber band on his back
molar. His teeth are still rolling in. This was the original problem.)
Do I have any recourse since he did not inform me of the problem for
13 months?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
- From: Bill
- Re: Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
- From: Joel344
- Re: Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
- Prev by Date: Re: I have to have perio surgery Help
- Next by Date: Re: Just paid $130 for 30-minute consultation...
- Previous by thread: Fake teeth and braces?
- Next by thread: Re: Unnecessary Porlongation of Treatment
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
