Re: Alternate site


Sue wrote:


Reply. I got tired of her starting threads about me and calling me a
dumb blonde, so I threw a little bit back at her, ONCE. Seems that
offended her.

Huh, I don't recall you posting too much here, maybe that was on
another group like dentaltown. In that case I am not very familiar
with your history

..

Reply. Who says I am defending anyone? I don't care for the
pain-in-the-*** victim mentality and that the whole world somehow owes
you something attitude.

You wouldn't think that if you had gone through an "adverse reaction"
to amalgam posioning. Don't forgot that release of hg from amalgam
is highly variable some do corrode, are mixed wrong (however you
want to look at). after all this arguing back and forth and joking it
is easy to forget that Hg is still a potent neurotoxin, it always was.

I do not care for using blunt force to shove issues down others'
throats. The name-calling, calling everyone else stupid etc. is very
unflattering.

Things have gotten better here actually. I'm not sure how long you
have been posting here, but some of the dentists were insulting certain
individuals for a long period of time.


Reply. I already commented on this but you do not seem to hear. Who is
going to listen to someone that keeps bashing others, calling them
stupid and simply acting like a turd?

Actually someone who is truly objectve can separate the message from
the messanger. On the other hand some with a bias takes delight in
blaming the messanger.


Reply. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. It is like speaking to a
brick wall when trying to speak to someone that views themself as a
complete victim. You act as you believ that your dentist
intentionally tried your life. You and I both know that is simply not
true.

Some professionals do behave sloppily to make money at patient expense.
Who would you blame. Society? That is a strange aspect of all this
amalgam stuff, Hg fillings haven't been used in a bubble, but someone
has to know
those things aren't safe. And look here, you could make that argument
with
anything. For example is it really the manufacturers fault that
somebody
got lung cancer from a cigarrette? You could always say that noone is
to blame for anything, but I don't see you calling the plaintiffs in
Tobacco
lawsuits "whiny victims", or arguing "lack of cigarette company
accountability". BECAUSE you have a biased self serving agenda.



Reply. Here we go again. Victim, victim victim. Try to see yourself as
something other than a victim and perhaps you may get further with your
cause. JMHO. This is NOT an attack, this is simply a truth as I see it,
and one that you need to hear.

I don't really think you understand the amount of damage to the nervous
system (and jaw) Hg can do. In this sense you are greatly
underestimating
the damage denistry can do and very niave. If it were me I would be
like, well thanks for the info and i'm glad it didn't happen to me,
Besides who speaks
for Kids and other people affectd by amalgam tha no one will believe?
Not
Sue, she's too busy making sure the dentist's aren't offended by the
public
and getting them lemonade. Thank goodness a Mensian took the time to
post
the truth on this NG!


When your friends come and bomabard this NG, you know exactly what
will happen. Everyone will leave.

I am not bombarding this newsgroup.

Reply. Excuse me but you just threatened to have your friends come and
bombard this NG.

Look at all the comments made on this newsgroup. Now my statement was
I am not bombarding this NG. Then you turn that into, well I MAY do
this
or that.

Again bias, on YOUR part becaue I am being hung for something I said
which may possibly imply something in the future. Meanwhile all the
current
and past professional misinifortion and nasty comments by DDS' are
completely forgiven and who cares if a few patients here and there got
posined by dentists. They are just "whiny victims"



Reply. huh? This makes no sense. These topics are unrelated.

Oh yeah, they are both controversial and discussed frequently, and
many threads are started by fluoride activists, yet you go after
amalgam.
Why? because it irritates the dentists more, and you are defending them
or something.

And IMO it's not up to you to direct me how to use my time or anyone
else, nor is it you business, UNLESS you want to direct the dentists
how to use their time. But I guess your not going do that?

Reply. When your business is affecting my time, it becomes my business
too. Yet since it is none of my business anyway, then I guess I guess
this is the solution...... FILTER ON.

That's right ! this is a Public newgroup that is supposed to discuss
the science
of dental materials. Not the dentistsI's and Sues' personal opinion and
"I don't actually need to discuss REAL amalgam science NG". Did
the anti-amalgamists put the "Science" in SMD? Neither me Nor Jan or
chuck or anybody else needs to waste thier time being berated by
someone too lazy to read the REAL science and defending dentists in
knee jerk fashion while quoting ADA soundbytes ( which the ADA won't
even defend in court) just to make themselves feel good. God Bless
America and Freedom of speech, the scientific method and the US
congress (for finally introducting a Bill to ban amalgam)

.

Quantcast