Re: Laser dentistry
- From: "krzysztof polanowski" <hsm.a.polanowska@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 09:56:02 +0100
practically the preparetion using lasers for hard tissue doesnt eliminate
convantional burs in 100% and next point it takes much more time.
Using this kind of laser its imporetant to have apt adhesive bonding system.
For these people who really afraid of drilling Its ok but in most part of
cases
It is not important
Tn dental office the most universal type of laser is diode.
There is couple factors:
equipment cost
the cases possible to use
the advantages for patients
cost for patient
regards kris-Polanowski DDS
U¿ytkownik "Eigenvector" <m44_master@xxxxxxxxx> napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
news:IaydnSaJIbzFiEzYnZ2dnUVZ_uqvnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dartos" <tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1171290987_8845@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Waterlase, Hoya-Conbio, and Lares have lasers that will cut
tooth structure and remove decay.
The claims are that you don't need anesthetic *most* of the time.
I have had a Waterlase for almost 3 years and I have not found
that statement to be true. I still use local anesthesia on most
cases.
The main advantages to the dentist is that it does not cause
fractures in the enamel and it causes much less bleeding of
the gum tissue (very helpful for certain restorations). Patients
like not feeling any vibration, pressure, or noise through the teeth as
they are being cut.
That last one is probably a bigger consideration than dentists
normally consider. Even when it doesn't *HURT*, touching a
spinning bur to tooth structure can be quite frightening for the
patient. The pressure and vibrations echo through the teeth and
bones. The laser has none of that.
The disadvantages are cost, cutting slower, and not living up to
the 'painless' promises. It also won't cut amalgam and isn't
good for crown preps.
JME,
Steve
Wow, it sounds like he's on top of it then. With my receded gumlines I
certainly don't need to have tissue removed, and other than that they
haven't replaced drills yet.
I will totally agree with you on your estimation of how much the action of
a drill can frighten patients.
Eigenvector wrote:
For some reason I got it into my head that the use of lasers in
dentistry has pretty well ended the need for a drill or at least reduced
its need.
So whenever I ask my dentist about the use of lasers (mainly as a way to
reduce anxiety) he scoffs and says that lasers are used typically for
reduction of gumline. Also that they are extremely expensive.
Does my dentist need to go back to school or what? What's the skinny on
lasers in the office?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Steven Fawks
- Re: Laser dentistry
- References:
- Laser dentistry
- From: Eigenvector
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Dartos
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Eigenvector
- Laser dentistry
- Prev by Date: Re: Dentist Damaged Front Teeth w/ Instruments?
- Next by Date: Re: Could anesthesia or the oral surgery cause Bell's Palsy?...
- Previous by thread: Re: Laser dentistry
- Next by thread: Re: Laser dentistry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|