Re: Laser dentistry
- From: "Eigenvector" <m44_master@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:11:59 -0800
"Steven Fawks" <tuthjockey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1171418962_8915@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If the patient is anesthetised, you can turn up the power and it's
not as slow as some would make it out to be. Learning the focus length
and using 4.0 or greater magnification helps increase efficiency
greatly.
It's pretty cool to watch the decay just disappear with every
'pop'.
What is better? Five minutes of unnerving high speed drilling or
ten minutes of a more relaxed procedure?
Steve
Depends on the difference in cost. I don't have a clue what the difference
would be.
krzysztof polanowski wrote:
practically the preparetion using lasers for hard tissue doesnt eliminate
convantional burs in 100% and next point it takes much more time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Steven Fawks
- Re: Laser dentistry
- References:
- Laser dentistry
- From: Eigenvector
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Dartos
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Eigenvector
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: krzysztof polanowski
- Re: Laser dentistry
- From: Steven Fawks
- Laser dentistry
- Prev by Date: Re: Sonicare toothbrush causing excess saliva?
- Next by Date: Re: Keep popping out filling
- Previous by thread: Re: Laser dentistry
- Next by thread: Re: Laser dentistry
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|