Re: inlays
- From: "ahuangdds2@xxxxxxxxx" <ahuangdds2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Apr 2007 06:13:17 -0700
On Apr 29, 7:45 am, seagate1...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 29, 5:50 am, George <chpet...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 29, 12:13 am, seagate1...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
just curious, why would a patient opt for an inlay restoration when a
direct compositie restoration is few hundreds cheaper?
The inlay is designed to restore a large area of damage, like whole
cusps broken off or very wide boxes.
But that would be onlays which would restore large preparations. As
for inlays, aren't the outlines generally narrower and resemble
typical class IIs? If so, I can't find a compelling reason for a
client to spend around $500 for an inlay if they can get a regular
comp restoration for less than a quarter of the same price.
I used a model with porcelain inlay/Onlay, and Gold inlay in my
office. I take out some flowable composite, and light cure right
before the patient then give it to them. Don't make it too thick
because you want them to break them. I explain to them composite is
chemically bond to the tooth surface, while the class II inlays are
resin bonded to seal all the gaps. Then I concluded:
1. Inlay are strong because material
2. Better seal over time with changes in temperature in the harsh oral
environment
3. Inlays does not stain like the composite
4. It is a superior product only few can afford and appreciate. It is
an long term investment for people who really care for their oral
health, and that is what I will do for myself.
Now I never do CEREC inlays, only indirect Inlays.
Albert
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: inlays
- From: The Webby
- Re: inlays
- References:
- inlays
- From: seagate1556
- Re: inlays
- From: George
- Re: inlays
- From: seagate1556
- inlays
- Prev by Date: Re: inlays
- Next by Date: Re: Man Accused of Dental Work in Garage
- Previous by thread: Re: inlays
- Next by thread: Re: inlays
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|