Re: Finding a new direction for the NTI discussion

On Jun 25, 5:20 pm, The Webby <tmjiatroepide...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<d2d5aa90-faca-4152-b375-0113ed7f1...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,



 jerm <blown...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:16 am, The Webby <tmjiatroepide...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone.  As you all know, there are basically two active threads
concerning NTI related issues.

It seems to me that the discussion needs more direction; possibly with a
few subject lines to focus on various issues.

What are your thoughts on developing a more useful *series of threads*;  
focusing on the separate concerns as expressed in "NTI failure
continued" and "NTI continued", and perhaps one that brings them all
together in summary?

Webby

I believe the summary would be something like it didnt work for me. 43
days into NTI,and
im no better during the day. maybe it helps me sleep better, but
beyond that im in the same condition.

Okay... for example, one concern with two counterpoints.

Subject: Using an NTI: Reasonable and unreasonable expectations

1. The value of reasonable expectations

2. The risks of unreasonable expectations

I dont know if my expectations of pain relief were unreasonable or
reasonable,but i've had little or none as of yet.

Thanks for trying to help Webby. I suppose I'll be disappearing, that
seems to be what doctors and dentists wish I'd do
anyways. Take care.
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast