Re: Sister-in-law diagnosised with colon cancer
From: Elsie (urmelii65_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 07/25/04
- Previous message: www.ChantCd.com: "Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide"
- Maybe in reply to: Emily: "Re: Sister-in-law diagnosised with colon cancer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 25 Jul 2004 06:28:19 -0700
bobbi_h1960@hotmail.com (bobbi) wrote in message news:<5b1fbf5e.0407230545.21e239b@posting.google.com>...
> This morning we were awaken to some shocking news: my sister-in-law
> has been diagnosised with colon cancer. She is young - 35 - or I think
> she's young to be battling disease, but then again I don't know
> anything about colon cancer.
>
> We have some sketchy details, we haven't been able to talk to her or
> her husband yet. All we know is that my husband needs to be testing
> for the genetic form of this disease. What the heck is genetic testing
> anyway?
> It's all alittle overwhelming .. and I guess I don't need to tell this
> group that eh? :-|
>
> I don't know why I'm writing, as I don't have a specific question yet.
> I guess I just need to reach out ...
>
> Does anyone know of a good web site where we can read more about
> genetic colon cancer? I guess we'd better start reading and educating
> ourselves.
>
> I'll be back later today with more details ....
>
> bobbi
By now J has already sent you a good website.
Somebody else also said that your husband should have a colonoscopy.
I'm actually not sure that the virtual colonoscopy is as good as the
real thing. If you have a good doctor, the real thing is not so bad
anyway.
When they do a colonoscopy, they will be looking for polyps. Polyps
don't have to lead to cancer, but they can so Doctors tend to remove
them when they're found. Some family have a condition that makes them
have lots of polyps. If that's the case your husband's risk is
automatically greater than the average person's but normally, they
will find none or a few polyps. If they find a polyp, they will
probably remove it during the colonoscopy and that will be the end of
it.
About the familial thing, though. Sometimes the family history starts
with you. As far as I knew, I had one uncle who died of colon cancer
in his 60s. That does not constitute a family history. At the time,
all my uncle's brothers were checked and nobody had a polyp. I was
diagnosed with colon cancer at 38. NOW we have a family history. I
made my brother get himself checked. They found a polyp and removed
it. I am still working on my Mom to convince her to have my sister
checked. (She's 10 years younger than I am and has Down syndrome) My
kids will have to have a colonoscopy when they are about 28. Turns
out, we actually did have a family history all along, we just didn't
know that these people had cancer. There were just lots of cousins in
earlier generations who died of "colon blockage" or other unspecified
ailments having to do with the digestive system.
Elsie
- Previous message: www.ChantCd.com: "Re: Arnold Schwarzenegger Commits Suicide"
- Maybe in reply to: Emily: "Re: Sister-in-law diagnosised with colon cancer"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|