Re: How scientific are orthodox cancer treatments? by Walter Last

From: Anth (anon_at_anon.com)
Date: 08/14/04 

Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:12:51 +0100

Don't need peer reviewed cases - it's all on the net if you want it.
Google Dr Kelley pancreatic cancer Sloan Kettering review, all biopsy proven
pancreatic cancer median survival 9 years.
Anth

"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:cfjtei$tqp@library2.airnews.net...
>
> "Anth" <anon@anon.com> wrote in message
> news:156dnXO34aNiqYDcRVn-vw@nildram.net...
>> Ok
>> I'll bite, Dr Kelley's pancreatic cancer cases, show me a biased single
>> armed study of pancreatic cancer from any orthodox doctor,
>> that carries a 100% 5 year survival for stage III to IV pancreatic
> cancers..
>> Anth
>
> Can you please post peer-reviewed studies that this 100% survival rate.
>
> Jeff
>
>> "David Wright" <wright@clam.prodigy.net> wrote in message
>> news:Tu7Tc.2757$Y94.353@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com...
>> > In article <wy3Tc.23467$Jp6.14486@newsread3.news.atl.earthlink.net>,
>> > sty <dehart12345@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:cficli$4o4@library1.airnews.net...
>> >>
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > The survival rate with alternative treatment only (or no
>> >>> > > treatment --
>> >>> same
>> >>> > > thing) is about 0%.
>> >>>
>> >>Jeff, this line is 100% bull***. You know it is a lie, why did you
>> >>post
>> >>it?
>> >
>> > Actually, for some types of cancer it's very accurate. Childhood
>> > leukemias, for example. Indeed, for most cancers. If you have
>> > counterexamples, well, I'm all ears.
>> >
>> > -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
>> > These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
>> > "If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
>> > were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)
>>
>>
>
>