Re: Melanoma or not?
From: Jeffry L. Johnson (jlj_at_apk.net)
Date: 08/28/04
- Next message: Sam Libowitz: "Re: Info needed -- risks on general anesthesia for coma survivors"
- Previous message: Roman Bystrianyk: "Garden weeds 'could combat cancer'"
- In reply to: Parallax: "Re: Melanoma or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:16:58 -0400
Parallax <dbohara@mindspring.com> wrote:
> I believe the doc did a shave biopsy because he did not think it would
> be melanoma due to her age. The initial biopsy did NOT say melanoma
> but simply something about "severely atypical melanocytes" and it is
> being refferred to a second pathologist. If there is still
> uncertainty about melanoma or not, that is the reason for the sentinal
> node biopsy. However, the mapping of the nodes has to be done prior to
> excision. I may also be confused about terminology of "shave biopsy".
> He used a scalpel to remove the mole. The biopsy did say the sample
> was 2 mm thick.
Obtain a copy of the original pathology report. Also obtain copies of
any subsequent pathology reports from examination of the original
specimen (hopefully by a dermatopathologist).
Your mention of "severely atypical melanocytes" does not imply melanoma.
If melanoma is truly present the pathology report will likely include
statements about Breslow's Thickness and Clark's Level. These terms
are used to describe the thickness of the melanoma and how deeply the
melanoma has invaded the skin layers.
You state the sample was 2 mm thick but do not mention how thick the
cells of interest were. Is that listed in the report? Or was it not
because it is not melanoma?
A sentinel node biopsy is suggested for thicker melanomas that have a
greater possibility of invading and spreading. SNB is not necessary for
very thin melanomas that have not invaded the deeper layers of the skin.
What is your reasoning for a deeper excision? Were all of the cells of
interest not removed by the shave biopsy? This should be described in
the pathology report. If the original biopsy was deep enough to remove
all the cells of interest then a deeper excision may be unneccessary.
You should discuss the pathology report with your physician and
dermatologist.
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/melanoma
- Next message: Sam Libowitz: "Re: Info needed -- risks on general anesthesia for coma survivors"
- Previous message: Roman Bystrianyk: "Garden weeds 'could combat cancer'"
- In reply to: Parallax: "Re: Melanoma or not?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|