Full body scans raise cancer risk -- study

From: Roman Bystrianyk (rbystrianyk_at_gmail.com)
Date: 08/31/04


Date: 31 Aug 2004 04:28:31 -0700

http://www.healthsentinel.com/news.php?event=news_print_list_item&id=181

"Full body scans raise cancer risk -- study", Reuters, August 31,
2004,
Link: http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=573982&section=news

People who pay for whole-body X-ray scans in the hope of finding
tumors at their earliest stages may, ironically, be raising their
overall risk of cancer, doctors have warned.

The scans are marketed as a way to catch cancer before symptoms begin,
but the radiation from the scans themselves could cause cancer, the
researchers said.

CT or computed tomography scans involve X-rays, but computer software
and multiple angles produce a higher-quality image than the
traditional flat X-ray.

The scans are not the same as magnetic resonance imaging or MRI scans,
which do not expose the body to radiation.

Writing in the September issue of the journal Radiology, radiation
oncologist David Brenner and colleagues at Columbia University in New
York said whole-body CT scans pack a considerable radiation wallop.

"The radiation dose from a full-body CT scan is comparable to the
doses received by some of the atomic-bomb survivors from Hiroshima and
Nagasaki, where there is clear evidence of increased cancer risk,"
Brenner said in a statement on Tuesday.

They studied survivors who got low doses of radiation from the bombs,
not those who got the highest doses.

The dose from a single full-body CT is only slightly lower than the
mean dose experienced by some atomic bomb survivors, they said, and is
nearly 100 times that of a typical screening mammogram.

A 45-year-old person who gets one full-body CT screening would have an
estimated lifetime cancer death risk of approximately 0.08 percent,
which would produce cancer in one in 1,200 people, they estimated.

However, a 45-year-old who has annual full-body CT scans for 30 years
would accrue an estimated lifetime cancer mortality risk of about 1.9
percent or almost one in 50.

The risk may be worth it for someone who knows he or she has a high
probability of cancer, such as those with inherited genetic mutations
or a family history of the disease, Brenner said.

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States after
heart disease and is expected to kill 550,000 people this year.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How An Orthopedic Doctor Seemingly Insulted My Intelligence About X-Rays
    ... Low Radiation Doses May Raise Cancer Risk ... No Dose Is Too Tiny to Rule out a 'Small' Risk Increase, ...
    (sci.med.diseases.cancer)
  • Re: Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
    ... dose radiation and cancer fanned again the discussion about risk and ... even if the ability to monitor the increase in cancer related to ... radiation exposure will be very difficult as radiation-induced cancer ... The most widely used mathematical model in estimating radiation risk ...
    (sci.med.radiology)
  • Diagnostic Radiation Exposure, Renewed Concerns
    ... dose radiation and cancer fanned again the discussion about risk and ... even if the ability to monitor the increase in cancer related to ... radiation exposure will be very difficult as radiation-induced cancer ... The most widely used mathematical model in estimating radiation risk ...
    (sci.med.radiology)
  • Re: color doppler ultrasound to detect prostate cancer?
    ... The question is if you don't detect any signs of colon cancer or ... scans (which may or may not include the colonoscopy) are very expensive and not covered by insurance. ... danger that you did not mention is the radiation ... organ- and gender-specific excess relative risks for cancer incidence in Japanese A-bomb survivors were used as a basis to generate risk estimates for the U.S. population. ...
    (sci.med.prostate.bph)
  • Re: color doppler ultrasound to detect prostate cancer?
    ... and will need an endoscopic colonoscopy anyway to ... The question is if you don't detect any signs of colon cancer or ... danger that you did not mention is the radiation ... A-bomb survivors were used as a basis to generate risk estimates for the ...
    (sci.med.prostate.bph)