Re: Cancer Quack gets another one (crosspost)

From: J (taborca_at_example.com)
Date: 09/01/04 

Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 07:15:01 -0400

Peter Moran wrote:

> "Anth" <anon@anon.com> wrote in message
>
> > http://www.citylightsnews.com/ce/diary-1aug04.htm
> > Anth
> >
> Quote---
>
> "Your "piece of cake" approach to serious cancer activity has fooled me in
> taking wrong decisions. Don't worry, I know very well what you would say...
> the ultimate decision lay in my hands. However this decision was made as a
> result of your confidence that this was an easy matter using your program.
> While on the program when I showed concern about the CEA rising. You said
> this was probably a good thing as the body was getting rid of the cancer.
> You could not be any further away from the truth.
> I am not running away from my responsibility, but I can still point at your
> actions and your irresponsible words to help someone else in my situation
> make better decisions. "
>
> How is the average person to know how to evaluate the claims of the quacks?
> There is nothing noble about "patient choice" when it is based upon
> ubiquitous lies and false promises.
>
> The cancer sufferer is certainly in no position to dispassionately evaluate
> all the claims, and, in any case, has the right to gamble on the longest
> odds if they should wish to.
>
> It is we who don't yet have cancer that should be exposing the corruption
> that drives most "alternative" treatment of cancer. Merely insisting on a
> smidgeon more evidence and a better quality of testimonial would weed out a
> lot of the worst quacks.
>
> Peter Moran

This has to be repeated on other newsgroups.
And he's Canadian.

http://www.citylightsnews.com/ce/main.htm
Did you look at all the "quack things" he tried there (and visited?)
However, he was surgically resected for bowel cancer in year 2000...
I haven't read each entry as to whether he was getting followup monitoring (but
will try to)
Or hope you'll be able to ...(and continue this thread).

Thanks Peter.
J

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Tim Bolen again
    ... > Peter Moran: ... > You stated that Hulda Clark is "one of the worst cancer charlatans in ... > state "Everyone knows what the scientific community thinks of Hulda ... claims to be able to easily cure any cancer and no one can produce cured ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Peter Moran admits hes never had it happen to him
    ... Peter Moran: ... But your version of the story claims that it was the remission of a patient ... this is why those with cancer cure claims need to publish their ... remains another of the hurdles Revici has yet to overcome.. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Peter Moran - Wheres the "Expert" Critique?
    ...  if Hulda Clark has a method for curing cancer, ... You, as well as Peter Moran, don't seem to understand simple logic. ... If it is such a great idea to subject patients to intense outside ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Vitamin C Possible Cancer-Killing Promise
    ... Peter Moran wrote: ... >> High-dose intravenous vitamin C may be effective in treating cancer, ... >> oral ascorbate, while subsequent studies used only oral administration. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Peter Moran - Wheres the "Expert" Critique?
    ...  if Hulda Clark has a method for curing cancer, ... You, as well as Peter Moran, don't seem to understand simple logic. ... If it is such a great idea to subject patients to intense outside ... quackbusters - and we know that they lie, lie, lie. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)