In study, clinicians rate top medical journals

From: Jupiter (jekluk_at_aol.com)
Date: 09/06/04

  • Next message: Andrew Heenan: "Re: In study, clinicians rate top medical journals SPAM" 
    Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:56:10 GMT

    Doctors can't waste time reading articles of little clinical importance.

    A study published today in BMC Medicine rates 170 medical journals by number
    of clinically useful articles that they publish, as assessed by clinicians
    based on the importance of the findings and soundness of the methodology.

    http://www.world-science.net/newspg2/040905_journalsfrm.htm

  • Next message: Andrew Heenan: "Re: In study, clinicians rate top medical journals SPAM"

    Relevant Pages

    • In study, clinicians rate top medical journals
      ... Doctors can't waste time reading articles of little clinical importance. ... of clinically useful articles that they publish, as assessed by clinicians ...
      (sci.med.prostate.prostatitis)
    • In study, clinicians rate top medical journals
      ... Doctors can't waste time reading articles of little clinical importance. ... of clinically useful articles that they publish, as assessed by clinicians ...
      (sci.med.diseases.hepatitis)
    • In study, clinicians rate top medical journals
      ... Doctors can't waste time reading articles of little clinical importance. ... of clinically useful articles that they publish, as assessed by clinicians ...
      (sci.med.diseases.lyme)
    • In study, clinicians rate top medical journals
      ... Doctors can't waste time reading articles of little clinical importance. ... of clinically useful articles that they publish, as assessed by clinicians ...
      (sci.med.nutrition)