Re: UNM prevails against Knight/Scallen in lawsuit on patents

From: Orac (orac_usa_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 11/19/04 

Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 03:18:17 GMT

In article <evTmd.247159$Pl.29421@pd7tw1no>,
 "Steph" <steph@vancouver.island> wrote:

> "Thomas Huxley" <th_huxley@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
> news:537c5a2.0411171215.6e7ee7b0@posting.google.com...
> > UNM prevails in lawsuit on patents
> >
> > Federal Circuit Court concludes "...Knight's Response contains
> > multiple amorphous and illogical arguments that do not pertain to the
> > issue of royalties."
> >
>
>
> I do hope Ch(K)ristopher Dale is reading this..............

He will. As far as I've been able to tell, he usually browses this
newsgroup only on weekends. I'm betting he'll see the post on Saturday
or Sunday and explain everything to us. ;-) 

-- 
Orac        |"I am not interested in trying to compensate
            | for your amazing lack of observation."
            |
            |                              Orac