Re: laetrile
From: Steph (steph_at_vancouver.island)
Date: 12/17/04
- Previous message: J: "Re: laetrile (crosspost)"
- In reply to: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Next in thread: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Reply: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 02:12:09 GMT
"Peter Moran" <moringa@gil.com.au> wrote in message
news:41c1fbd9$0$668$61c65585@uq-127creek-reader-01.brisbane.pipenetworks.com.au...
>
> "john" <nospamoridiots@vaccine.com> wrote in message
> news:cpsrmf$aq6$1@hercules.btinternet.com...
>> http://www.whale.to/cancer/laetrile.html
>
> John, have you ever asked Ralph Moss why Laetrile is not amongst his
> currently recommended alternative treatments for cancer? How can that be?
> (I have one of the reports patients can buy off him).
>
> Also ask Manner what happened to mice who were injected with the enzymes
> but NOT given the Laetrile (in a double blind study, please), seeing
> Laetrile alone had no effect on cancer in his studies.
>
> Laetrile had no effect on established cancer in Suguira's studies either,
> according to Moss's own account of the grand medical conspiracy's supposed
> suppression of his work. . The most that Suguira ever claiimed was a
> modest reduction in or delay in the onset of metastases in a mouse model,
> but that could not be replicated in a number of blinded studies.
>
> Peter Moran
>
>>
>>
>
>
Peter, asking sensible questions of the whale is like trying to nail
blancmange to the wall......
- Previous message: J: "Re: laetrile (crosspost)"
- In reply to: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Next in thread: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Reply: Peter Moran: "Re: laetrile"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|