Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)
From: Socks the white house cat (agent01413_at_my-deja.com)
Date: 12/26/04
- Next message: Socks the white house cat: "Re: How Cancer Politics Have Kept You in the Dark Regarding Successful Alternatives ."
- Previous message: Robert Cohen: "Re: Plastic Microwave Container Scare"
- In reply to: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Next in thread: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Reply: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 06:09:16 -0700
Not exactly Christmas greetings, but rumor has it that
not_giving@you.my.address.com (Willcox) said:
>
> I looked up the definition of a quack to be sure, Websters says it is
> someone who pretends to have medical expertise; So then why does your
> site list licensed doctors?
It says "a pretender to medical skill". A licensed proctologist who claims
to be a brain surgeon would be a licensed doctor pretending to a have a
medical skill that he doesn't have, and appropriately listed as a quack.
Incidentally, in a separate post, you gave a different definition. I
assume that with this post, you are retracting that post and admitting that
you fabricated the "defination" you came up with there.
--
I AM SPEWS (SLAPP PREVENTION ELECTRONIC WHITENOISE SYSTEM)
"The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day
that they start making vacuum cleaners."--Doc in alt.privacy
- Next message: Socks the white house cat: "Re: How Cancer Politics Have Kept You in the Dark Regarding Successful Alternatives ."
- Previous message: Robert Cohen: "Re: Plastic Microwave Container Scare"
- In reply to: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Next in thread: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Reply: Willcox: "Re: Quacked? Howard Strauss (Arizona) (X-post)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
