Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?
JF_at_NoName.com
Date: 02/13/05
- Next message: Joe_at_guesswho.com: "Importing drugs FROM USA to Canada"
- Previous message: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- In reply to: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Next in thread: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Reply: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:28:39 GMT
>>> There is a third option - if you are feeling well, don't take
>>> any treatment until there is a reason to.
>>
>> I understand that this is what some doctors recommend, and I
>> understand that since there is no clear evidence that early
>> treatment is better, it is an option.
>>
>> However, logic dictates that early treatment is better.
>>
>
> Logic may be a poor guide. And unfortunately, after surgery and multiple
> chemotherapy, you don't have "early" diesase.
Poor guide it may be, but if it's a choice between logic
and 'gut instinct' (which is really nothing more than a wild
assed guess), then I choose logic.
As for 'early', perhaps a better way to say it is:
"...logic dictates that the earlier treatment the better."
- Next message: Joe_at_guesswho.com: "Importing drugs FROM USA to Canada"
- Previous message: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- In reply to: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Next in thread: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Reply: Steph: "Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|