Re: Radioactive Antibodies: outlook?

JF_at_NoName.com
Date: 02/14/05 

Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 01:39:25 GMT

> It's not a wild assed guess. It's based on the evidence.
> But you should do what you think best

     I'm confused. I thought that the evidence for

(1) delaying treatment until clinical symptoms appear
  vs.
(2) treating on CA125 rise only

   was inconclusive. In other words, picking
between (1) or (2) was a wild assed guess.

   Are you saying that there is a *concensus* that shows
that (1) is better than (2)?

   Obviously, if repeated high quality clinical trials
showed that option (1) was superior in outcome, I would
have to reconsider my position.