Re: Cancer treatment after chemo
- From: "Steph" <steph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 08:14:30 GMT
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fgBfe.9705$7F4.3550@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Kristofer D. Dale" <barefoot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5776d$427af1d3$402a802f$27381@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I recently provided the following link in response to this thread about
>> other treatments that are available to those who have been through
>> standard regimens: http://www.vitalethine.org
>>
>> "Jeff" responded:
>>
>>>Better yet, save your money (the above "treatment" has not been proven
>>>in humans, only test tubes), eat a healthy diet and excercise.
>>
>> Yep, listen to this ignoramus, who clearly knows next to nothing about
>> the vitalethine research, or he would not be making blanket statements.
>> Let's be clear about this. This patented and published therapy has been
>> extensively tested in animal models, and for various inethical and inept
>> reasons, has yet to be given a meaningful trial in humans, but there is
>> a stark difference between "chemo" agents and this synthetic "pro-drug"
>> form of naturally occurring compounds, known collectively as
>> "vitaletheine immune modulators".
>
> The "inethical" and "inept" reasons probably include that no drug company
> will risk money on a useless treatment.
>
>
Unlike your boyfriend.
.
- References:
- Cancer treatment after chemo
- From: Kristofer D. Dale
- Re: Cancer treatment after chemo
- From: Jeff
- Cancer treatment after chemo
- Prev by Date: Re: c reactive protein and lymphoma
- Next by Date: Information/help needed
- Previous by thread: Re: Cancer treatment after chemo
- Next by thread: Tobacco Plants Used to Produce Monoclonal Antibodies
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|