Re: Steph......
- From: "Mary Fisher" <mary.fisher@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:25:59 +0100
"Barb" <ammerman@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VrIwe.481$Ke3.34716@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Thanks for answering, Steph. No, the mammogram was of the opposite
> breast. The cancerous breast was removed--modified radical mastectomy.
> Had the procedure this afternoon and was told that all calcifications were
> removed and pathology would follow in a few days. Now the nervous wait
> for results. I think there's more liklihood that the calcifications are
> benign than malignant, but there's still some stress.
I had calcifications in one breast way before the cancer was found in the
other. Eight years before - when Mr Pratt told me he knew ladies. They
didn't remove them even for biopsy, there was a note in my folder, " ...
interestingly there are calcifications in the left breast ... " As far as I
know they're still there.
Worrying won't help, Barb, but you know that!
Mary
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Steph......
- From: Barb
- Re: Steph......
- Prev by Date: Soy milk may be causing leukemia
- Next by Date: breast cancer group won't take pharma funding
- Previous by thread: Soy milk may be causing leukemia
- Next by thread: Re: Steph......
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|